Home
Search results “All about carbon dating” for the 2008
Radiometric Dating
 
07:10
A video from the New Zealand E=Mc2 website regarding radiometric dating. Full article and more videos- http://www.eequalsmcsquared.auckland.ac.nz/sites/emc2/videos/cool-kiwi-science.cfm
Views: 95941 stevebd1
The Shroud and the Carbon Dating Debate
 
03:50
http://www.shroud.com has the latest on the upcoming public showing of the shroud in 2010 and new C-14 testings. If one assumes that the radiocarbonists' claim that the Shroud of Turin is a 14th century forgery is correct. It is based on what that conclusion tells us about the forger. It tells us that: 1. The forger first painted the bloodstains before he painted the image. 2. The forger integrated forensic qualities to his image that would only be known 20th century science. 3. The forger duplicated blood flow patterns in perfect forensic agreement to blood flow from the wrists at 65° from vertical to suggest the exact crucifixion position of the arms. 4. The forger "painted" the blood flows with genuine group AB blood that he had "spiked" with excessive amounts of bilirubin since the forger knew that severe concussive scourging with a Roman flagrum would cause erythrocyte hemolysis and jaundice. 5. The forger "plotted" the scourge marks on the body of the "man in the shroud" to be consistent under forensic examination with two scourgers of varying height. 6. The forger also duplicated abrasion and compression marks on the scourge wounds of the shoulders to suggest to 20th century forensic examiners that the "man in the shroud" had carried a heavy weight following the scourging. 7. The forger, against all convention of medieval artistry, painted the body he was "hoaxing" as Jesus of Nazareth, nude to conform to genuine Roman crucifixions. 8. The forger, as the forensic genius he was, illustrated the nails of crucifixion accurately through the wrists rather than the hands as in all other conventional medieval representations. He also took into account that the thumbs of a crucified victim would rotate inward as a result of median nerve damage as the nails passed through the spaces of Destot. 9. The forger was clever enough to "salt" the linen with the pollens of plants indigenous only to the environs of Jerusalem in anticipation of 20th century palynological analysis. 10. The forger was an artist who surpassed the talents of all known artists to the present day, being able to "paint" an anatomically and photographically perfect human image in a photographic negative manner, centuries before photography, and be able to do so without being able to check his work, close up, as he progressed. 11. The forger was able to paint this image with some unknown medium using an unknown technique, 30-40 feet away in order to discern the shadowy image as he continued. 12. The forger was clever enough to depict an adult with an unplaited pony-tail, sidelocks and a beard style consistent with a Jewish male of the 1st century. 13. The forger thought of such minute details as incorporating dirt from the bare feet of the "man in the shroud" consistent with the calcium carbonate soil of the environs of Jerusalem. 14. This forger was such an expert in 20th century biochemistry, medicine, forensic pathology and anatomy, botany, photography and 3-D computer analysis that he has foiled all the efforts of modern science. His unknown and historically unduplicated artistic technique surpasses all great historical artists, making the pale efforts of DaVinci, Michaelangelo, Raphael and Botticelli appear as infantile scribblings. If the Shroud of Turin is a forgery of the 14th century, as the radiocarbonists claim, and not a genuine artifact of the 1st century, all of these qualities of the purported medieval "forger" must be accepted. If the Shroud was "forged" it would have to have been painted. It is an irrefutable fact that there is NO paint or pigment on the Shroud of Turin leaving the only explanation of the technique of the forger to have used "photography" to manufacture the relic in the THIRTEENTH CENTURY!! Some authors have gone so far as to suggest exactly that. This is patently absurd! CONCLUSION The Shroud of Turin is a genuine artifact of a first century Roman crucifixion of an adult Jewish male. The radiocarbon dating placing the manufacture of the linen in the 14th century was flawed by extrinsic C14 accumulated over centuries of fungal growth, candle smoke and the intense heat of the fire of 1532. There is NO paint on the linen of the shroud and is not the artifice of a forger.
Views: 3056 Dr0pDuckC0ver
Carbon Dating the Toast
 
01:46
Song. In my head this has all sorts of orchestration and instrumentation and is arranged beautifuly. In reality it's me and a pink ukulele. I have had no end of computer problems trying to make this so it is a bit jumpy at times. I have posted it now just so I don't have to keep fiddling with it. It's hard to make things when you just have windows movie maker and an old PC with hardly any memory! Music and Lyrics, Elise Harris.
Views: 2916 Elise Harris
Carbon Dating
 
01:00
Rsa Project.
Views: 4123 jamiedesign
RE: Most important video ever made (4 of 4)
 
01:00
last tidbit that didn't fit on the others. Thanks for all the responses. CORRECTIONS: pt1. Carbon dating can not be used to date a T-rex bone. C-14 works to about 50,000 years ago. T-Rex is 65-68M years old.
Views: 494 happysplodie
Carbon-14 Dating
 
03:43
Note: This is a mirror of Aaronk1994's video.
Views: 345 AaronsBlackBox
Its all about carbon
 
08:39
this was an extra credit assignment for mr. ozuna's class....and i did it
Views: 121 zippy98aolcom
Dating 101-Dating Model
 
03:28
Dave Ashley begins to explore the basic foundations of Dating 101
Views: 1424 shootout098
9 - Human Ancestry Made Easy
 
09:16
This video traces our migration out of Africa and explains, through DNA evidence, how humans colonized the world. It is part of the Made Easy series of videos that show the evidence of our origins, from the Big Bang onwards. (Music: "Allegretto" by Bond and "The Ballad of Henry Darger" by Natalie Merchant.)
Views: 207444 potholer54
Eve To Now (part 2)
 
01:36
Take a trip back in time and meet the "Mother of all mankind" the common ancestor from whom we all descend! (part 2 of 2)
Views: 5868 cassiopeiaproject
Chemical Party
 
01:33
Very funny clip explaining why noble gases do not bond ;-) and why Potassium and Water lead to explosive reactions. REALLY GREAT! http://www.ec.europa.eu/research/mariecurieactions
Views: 2265399 addyson99
1. Climate Change -- the scientific debate
 
10:42
A basic look at how climate scientists infer that man-made carbon gases are changing the climate, and how this view is contradicted by other climate scientists who are skeptics. I am a former science correspondent with an interest in reporting the facts, not the media hype. My thanks to 9thgate for checking my script for errors. Please note that the animation of a photon striking a carbon atom is not meant to be visually correct, it is simply an illustration of CO2 absorbing energy and re-emitting it at a different wavelength. Given the limitations I have in making animations I could not spend an inordinate amount of time making a visually "correct" image of a photon striking an electron which moves into a different orbital plane, and even if I tried it would never be visually correct because on a quantum scale such an illustration is impossible. But thanks to all those who wrote in. The narration that accompanies the illustration is correct.
Views: 453112 potholer54
Final Proof Of Evolution Falsified
 
05:30
http://www.evolutionforum.info Check this out! Very interesting forum. http://evolutionsciencenow.blogspot.com/ Debunking radiometric dating destroys the idea of fossils as evidence. It is nothing more than a funny cult of fools who like this idea and nothing more. Copyright Havenmade Inc. 2008-2009 All rights reserved. You may may not make any copies of this video for redistribution. YOU MAY PLACE A DIRECT LINK TO THIS VIDEO BY EMBEDDING IT, BUT NEVER CAN YOU DOWN LOAD FOR REDISTRIBUTION. Well this is the wind that blows the house of cards down around the whole evolution hoax. If you still believe after this then you are really lost. This video, clearly shows you that fossil dating is not possible. There is no way to date fossils accurately at all, not even from 1000 years to 10,000years they could all be the same age. The evodelusionists have no clue what the conditions on earth were or where the materials came from or what has effected their conditions. They make assumptions that make asses out of themselves. Creation Vs Evolution Creationism Theories Creation Vs. Evolution Debate Creationism V.s. Evolution Evidence of Creationism Creationism Evolution Arguments Human Evolution Proof of Creation Facts on Creationism Evolution Versus Creationism Evolution of Man Creation Vs Evolution Evolution Evidence Human Evolution Timeline X-men Evolution Human Evolution Chart Natural Selection darwin darwin awards darwins theory of evolution darwinism darwins theory darwins theory of natural selection darwin theory evolution darwin theory of evolution darwin theory darwins finches Religion Vs. Evolution Evolution of Man Science Vs Religion Evolution Human Evolution Religious Theories of Evolution Theistic Evolution Christian Religion Evolution Satan's Evolution Greek Religion Evolution Define Evolution Biography of Richard Dawkins Dawkins Evolution Biologist Richard Dawkins Richard Dawkins on Life after Death Richard Dawkins the Selfish Gene Richard Dawkins Quotes, Richard Dawkins What Is Richard Dawkins Known for? Richard Dawkins Memes Richard Dawkins the Blind Watchmaker Atheism And Beliefs Atheism Religion Kenneth Miller Finding Darwin's God Evolution Versus Christianity God Evolution Pope Evolution Evolution Versus Creation Theory Evolution Debates Human Evolution Evolution of Man Creation Vs Evolution Evolution Evidence Creationism Vs.evolution Creationism Theories Creationism Evolution Arguments Creationism Vs. Evolutionism Evolution Versus Creationism Definition of Creationism Scientific Creationism Evolution Creationism Schools Should Creationism Be Taught in Public Schools Article on Evolution And Creationism intelligent design intelligent design theory intelligent design theory of the universe intelligent design vs darwin theory intelligent design be taught in school intelligent design evolution intelligent design in public schools intelligent design vs. evolution intelligent design in schools intelligent design pros and cons Definition of Intelligent Design Intelligent Design Vs Darwin Theory Evidence for Intelligent Design Intelligent Design Theory of the Universe Intelligent Design Be Taught in School Creationism And Intelligent Design Summary of Intelligent Design What Does the Theory of Intelligent Design Say??
Views: 19410 GoodScienceForYou
Radiation Collection (2 of 2) Carbon-14 & Cesium-137
 
05:50
More of my collection, consisting of Carbon-14 and Cesium-137, 10uCi of each! (I will not be answering any inquiries about where I got them, but they are legal!) Music- Nine Inch Nails - Survivalism - Year Zero Nine Inch Nails - God Given - Year Zero
Views: 3282 AScannerClearly
The Best Man Book
 
01:37
The purpose of this book is to provide boys and men of all ages, stages and situations in life with a blueprint for manhood success. This book will clearly identify: · The purpose of every man. · The enemies in manhood. · What is a gentleman? · What is a good man? · The purpose of the penis. · The laws of sexual responsibility. · The laws of male leadership. · The laws of male financial responsibility. · The male guide for responsible dating. · What every man must do before getting married. · The roles and responsibilities of a husband & father. · Why men need to grow up. · And much more. These valuable lessons will provide men and boys of all ages with proper guidance that will produce success in education, health, business, finances, marriage, and fatherhood. $19.95
Views: 242 jesseandkelley
Radioisotopes Science Project Video
 
03:09
Joaquin, Eliseo, Maria, Christian, and Claudia. They came to my house and we filmed a video about why you should live in a world with radioisotopes. The nuclear explosion was rendered and created in 3D Max, video edited with Adobe After Effects CS3 Credit to Andrew Kramer for his amazing After Effects plugins that were used in this video (blood, explosion)
Views: 1277 krohn7master
Dating: a film about dating
 
08:28
Boise LDS Institute film festival 2008 participant. awesome. we just got to thinking about why dating in the church is sometimes lacking and then decided to make a video. it's supposed to be funny, not a really serious documentary. feel free to laugh...if you feel the need.
Views: 1057 Emily Hansen
SHROUD OF TURIN CARBON TESTING CONSPIRACY
 
03:01
https://www.vaticancatholic.com https://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com Creation and Miracles clip---This very important tape was made for Catholics and to present the Catholic Faith to non-Catholics. It has influenced non-Catholics to convert to the Catholic Faith. It disproves evolution, shows evidence of a world-wide flood, covers Biblical miracles, modern day miracles, Eucharist miracles, incorrupt bodies of saints and the Shroud of Turin.
Views: 5343 vaticancatholic.com
Jurassic Ark (Before the Flood)
 
09:19
To see the whole seminar of "Dinosaurs and the Bible," click here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZDQL6rF4bE Certain people (like Matt Damon) think its funny that Sarah Palin believes dinosaurs lived 4,000 years ago. Well, first of all, reptiles never stop growing. It's just a simple biological fact that reptiles grow all their life and never stop until the day they die. Well, look at the genealogies from Adam until Noah. People back then lived to be 900 years old, which is more than 10 times longer than the average life span today. Well, it wouldn't just be people would it? More than likely it would be plants, animals, the whole ecosystem. If a lizard's lifespan in Noah's day was about 10 times longer than today (and reptiles never stop growing) then back in Noah's day lizards and reptiles would have gotten huge! Scientists have found fossilized remains of crocodiles that reached up to 40 or 50 feet. Scientists say they are prehistoric, but I don't think so. I think they got so big because they lived so long in the days of Noah. Also, fossilization is caused by flooding. Scientists have found that the conditions that would be most ideal for the kind of massive fossil formations found in the sediments would be a violent, global flood catastrophe. Dinosaur remains worldwide are associated with water-laid sediment. Well, it just so happens that the bible talks about a flood like that. And it just so happens that it occurred in the days when reptiles and lizards would have gotten really really big. So the fact that we're digging up enormous reptiles and lizards up out of the ground, most of which are completely fossilized, this fits into the bible just perfectly. The reason dinosaurs seem to be a problem for people of faith, is because the million year age estimates assigned to dinosaurs by evolutionists are presented to the public in such a way to where they seem to be scientific fact, when in reality they are actually quite theoretical. Not all scientists agree that dinosaurs went extinct millions of years ago. Not even all the dating methods agree with those million year age estimates. And even the dating methods that do agree have been found to be very questionable and many times inaccurate. For instance, according to the Journal of Geophysical Research in 1978, new rock in the form of hardened lava flows produced estimated ages as great as 3 billion to 10.5 billion years, when they were actually less than 200 years old. Does that sound like an accurate age estimate to you? That's not just a minor miscalculation. That's a major, major inaccuracy. However, when you go to the science museum, they show you a skeleton of a Tyrannosaurus Rex and say "This T-Rex lived 160 million years ago!" Okay, obviously someone who has been very invigorated by the shade of Charles Darwin seriously believes that skeleton is millions of years old. I'm not convinced. You know what I find convincing? I think dinosaurs got so big because they lived so long in Noah's day. They fossilized because of the flood waters. That sounds much more logical to me. Creation Scientists suspect that dinosaurs did not become extinct until about 3 or 4 thousand years ago. If you carbon date a dinosaur bone that has carbon in it, then you'll find it to be only a few thousand years old. Well, that makes sense, because the flood occurred about 4,400 years ago. However, Evolutionists won't carbon date dinosaur bones that contain carbon, because they know carbon dating will give them an age estimate of only a few thousand years. Well, that doesn't match their assumption of millions of years. So what they'll do is, they won't even bother to carbon date dinosaur bones. Instead they'll use alternative forms of radiometric dating like potassium-argon or uranium-lead, or some other form of radiometric dating which will give them the million year age estimates that they're looking for, based upon their pre-conceived idea of evolution. However, these alternative dating methods were the same ones used to give a rock less than 200 years old an age estimate of around 3 billion years (according to the Journal of Geophysical Research, 1978) To see the whole seminar of "Dinosaurs and the Bible," click here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZDQL6rF4bE Sources: "The Illustrated Origins Answer Book" by Paul S. Taylor. (Page 12, right hand column, 5th paragraph, 2nd sentence). Look it up. Dr. Duane Gish (PhD in biochemistry) Dr. Kent Hovind Ken Ham "Scientific Facts in the Bible" by Ray Comfort. (Page 80) http://www.creationmuseum.org/
Views: 33185 NathanH83
Chemical Party - Marie Curie
 
01:31
http://www.ec.europa.eu/research/mariecurieactions/index.htm Marie Curie is proud to present: "Chemicals having a party". Sexy carbons, bored noble gases, explosive reactions. Download: http://ec.europa.eu/avservices/video/video_prod_en.cfm?type=detail&prodid=6031&src=1
Views: 1201094 European Commission
Shroud of Turin (part 3)
 
07:16
Forensic and other scientific analyses produced evidence that the figure in the Shroud was that of a badly bruised man who was eventually crucified. However, carbon-dating in the early 80's showed that the cloth dates back to the Medieval Ages.This video is from the official website of the Philippine exhibit which started last July 2007 (http://www.shroudexhibits.ph/main/#).
Views: 60442 Fr. Raul Asuncion
2. Putting yourselves into other people's shoes
 
01:08:49
Game Theory (ECON 159) At the start of the lecture, we introduce the "formal ingredients" of a game: the players, their strategies and their payoffs. Then we return to the main lessons from last time: not playing a dominated strategy; and putting ourselves into others' shoes. We apply these first to defending the Roman Empire against Hannibal; and then to picking a number in the game from last time. We learn that, when you put yourself in someone else's shoes, you should consider not only their goals, but also how sophisticated are they (are they rational?), and how much do they know about you (do they know that you are rational?). We introduce a new idea: the iterative deletion of dominated strategies. Finally, we discuss the difference between something being known and it being commonly known. 00:00 - Chapter 1. Recap of Previous Lecture: Prisoners' Dilemma and Payoffs 06:47 - Chapter 2. The Formal Ingredients of a Game 16:01 - Chapter 3. Weakly Dominant Strategies 35:29 - Chapter 4. Rationality and Common Knowledge 01:05:37 - Chapter 5. Common Knowledge vs. Mutual Knowledge Complete course materials are available at the Yale Online website: online.yale.edu This course was recorded in Fall 2007.
Views: 195457 YaleCourses
Errata 2
 
02:12
This is my second errata video, covering mistakes made up to video 9. My thanks to all those who pointed out the errors. (Music: "Paris Paris" by Compagnie Creole)
Views: 58358 potholer54
Jon Jackson, the Blood Samples from the Shroud
 
06:51
4th and final segment The Hungary Prayer Manuscript of 1192 illustrates what can only be the Shroud of Turin, predating the earliest possible date of manufacture calculated by the AMS Carbon 14 testing. All of what I have explained above can be found in the voluminous scientific and popular literature on the shroud of Turin. At this point, I would like to offer a different paradigm for assessing the accuracy of the 14th century date and the resulting claim that the shroud is the work of a 14th century forger. Again, this article is not addressing the issue of whether or not the Shroud of Turin was the burial cloth of Jesus of Nazareth and its value as a "relic" of Christianity. It addresses only whether the shroud is a genuine archaeological artifact of a 1st century crucifixion. This paradigm assumes that the radiocarbonists' claim that the Shroud of Turin is a 14th century forgery is correct. It is based on what that conclusion tells us about the forger. It tells us that: 1. The forger first painted the bloodstains before he painted the image. 2. The forger integrated forensic qualities to his image that would only be known 20th century science. 3. The forger duplicated blood flow patterns in perfect forensic agreement to blood flow from the wrists at 65° from vertical to suggest the exact crucifixion position of the arms. 4. The forger "painted" the blood flows with genuine group AB blood that he had "spiked" with excessive amounts of bilirubin since the forger knew that severe concussive scourging with a Roman flagrum would cause erythrocyte hemolysis and jaundice. 5. The forger "plotted" the scourge marks on the body of the "man in the shroud" to be consistent under forensic examination with two scourgers of varying height. 6. The forger also duplicated abrasion and compression marks on the scourge wounds of the shoulders to suggest to 20th century forensic examiners that the "man in the shroud" had carried a heavy weight following the scourging. 7. The forger, against all convention of medieval artistry, painted the body he was "hoaxing" as Jesus of Nazareth, nude to conform to genuine Roman crucifixions. 8. The forger, as the forensic genius he was, illustrated the nails of crucifixion accurately through the wrists rather than the hands as in all other conventional medieval representations. He also took into account that the thumbs of a crucified victim would rotate inward as a result of median nerve damage as the nails passed through the spaces of Destot. 9. The forger was clever enough to "salt" the linen with the pollens of plants indigenous only to the environs of Jerusalem in anticipation of 20th century palynological analysis. 10. The forger was an artist who surpassed the talents of all known artists to the present day, being able to "paint" an anatomically and photographically perfect human image in a photographic negative manner, centuries before photography, and be able to do so without being able to check his work, close up, as he progressed. 11. The forger was able to paint this image with some unknown medium using an unknown technique, 30-40 feet away in order to discern the shadowy image as he continued. 12. The forger was clever enough to depict an adult with an unplaited pony-tail, sidelocks and a beard style consistent with a Jewish male of the 1st century. 13. The forger thought of such minute details as incorporating dirt from the bare feet of the "man in the shroud" consistent with the calcium carbonate soil of the environs of Jerusalem. 14. This forger was such an expert in 20th century biochemistry, medicine, forensic pathology and anatomy, botany, photography and 3-D computer analysis that he has foiled all the efforts of modern science. His unknown and historically unduplicated artistic technique surpasses all great historical artists, making the pale efforts of DaVinci, Michaelangelo, Raphael and Botticelli appear as infantile scribblings. If the Shroud of Turin is a forgery of the 14th century, as the radiocarbonists claim, and not a genuine artifact of the 1st century, all of these qualities of the purported medieval "forger" must be accepted. If the Shroud was "forged" it would have to have been painted. It is an irrefutable fact that there is NO paint or pigment on the Shroud of Turin leaving the only explanation of the technique of the forger to have used "photography" to manufacture the relic in the THIRTEENTH CENTURY!! Some authors have gone so far as to suggest exactly that. This is patently absurd! CONCLUSION The Shroud of Turin is a genuine artifact of a first century Roman crucifixion of an adult Jewish male. The radiocarbon dating placing the manufacture of the linen in the 14th century was flawed by extrinsic C14 accumulated over centuries of fungal growth, candle smoke and the intense heat of the fire of 1532. There is NO paint on the linen of the shroud and is not the artifice of a forger.
Views: 10292 Dr0pDuckC0ver
what is carbon offset
 
02:18
カーボンオフセットアニメーション
Views: 983 ecoreso2008
ALL THE EVIDENCE AGAINST EVOLUTION! MUST SEE!
 
00:06
All Evidence Against Evolution
Views: 16346 ReligiouslyAtheist
Isotopes - Roberto, Oscar, Emily, Anuar
 
02:04
11. c. Students know some naturally occurring isotopes of elements are radioactive, as are isotopes formed in nuclear reactions. 11. d. Students know the three most common forms of radioactive decay (alpha, beta, and gamma) and know how the nucleus changes in each type of decay.
Views: 976 hpscience
God's 3-D photograph and X-ray of the Resurrection
 
04:42
The Hungary Prayer Manuscript of 1192 illustrates what can only be the Shroud of Turin, predating the earliest possible date of manufacture calculated by the AMS Carbon 14 testing. All of what I have explained above can be found in the voluminous scientific and popular literature on the shroud of Turin. At this point, I would like to offer a different paradigm for assessing the accuracy of the 14th century date and the resulting claim that the shroud is the work of a 14th century forger. Again, this article is not addressing the issue of whether or not the Shroud of Turin was the burial cloth of Jesus of Nazareth and its value as a "relic" of Christianity. It addresses only whether the shroud is a genuine archaeological artifact of a 1st century crucifixion. This paradigm assumes that the radiocarbonists' claim that the Shroud of Turin is a 14th century forgery is correct. It is based on what that conclusion tells us about the forger. It tells us that: 1. The forger first painted the bloodstains before he painted the image. 2. The forger integrated forensic qualities to his image that would only be known 20th century science. 3. The forger duplicated blood flow patterns in perfect forensic agreement to blood flow from the wrists at 65° from vertical to suggest the exact crucifixion position of the arms. 4. The forger "painted" the blood flows with genuine group AB blood that he had "spiked" with excessive amounts of bilirubin since the forger knew that severe concussive scourging with a Roman flagrum would cause erythrocyte hemolysis and jaundice. 5. The forger "plotted" the scourge marks on the body of the "man in the shroud" to be consistent under forensic examination with two scourgers of varying height. 6. The forger also duplicated abrasion and compression marks on the scourge wounds of the shoulders to suggest to 20th century forensic examiners that the "man in the shroud" had carried a heavy weight following the scourging. 7. The forger, against all convention of medieval artistry, painted the body he was "hoaxing" as Jesus of Nazareth, nude to conform to genuine Roman crucifixions. 8. The forger, as the forensic genius he was, illustrated the nails of crucifixion accurately through the wrists rather than the hands as in all other conventional medieval representations. He also took into account that the thumbs of a crucified victim would rotate inward as a result of median nerve damage as the nails passed through the spaces of Destot. 9. The forger was clever enough to "salt" the linen with the pollens of plants indigenous only to the environs of Jerusalem in anticipation of 20th century palynological analysis. 10. The forger was an artist who surpassed the talents of all known artists to the present day, being able to "paint" an anatomically and photographically perfect human image in a photographic negative manner, centuries before photography, and be able to do so without being able to check his work, close up, as he progressed. 11. The forger was able to paint this image with some unknown medium using an unknown technique, 30-40 feet away in order to discern the shadowy image as he continued. 12. The forger was clever enough to depict an adult with an unplaited pony-tail, sidelocks and a beard style consistent with a Jewish male of the 1st century. 13. The forger thought of such minute details as incorporating dirt from the bare feet of the "man in the shroud" consistent with the calcium carbonate soil of the environs of Jerusalem. 14. This forger was such an expert in 20th century biochemistry, medicine, forensic pathology and anatomy, botany, photography and 3-D computer analysis that he has foiled all the efforts of modern science. His unknown and historically unduplicated artistic technique surpasses all great historical artists, making the pale efforts of DaVinci, Michaelangelo, Raphael and Botticelli appear as infantile scribblings. If the Shroud of Turin is a forgery of the 14th century, as the radiocarbonists claim, and not a genuine artifact of the 1st century, all of these qualities of the purported medieval "forger" must be accepted. If the Shroud was "forged" it would have to have been painted. It is an irrefutable fact that there is NO paint or pigment on the Shroud of Turin leaving the only explanation of the technique of the forger to have used "photography" to manufacture the relic in the THIRTEENTH CENTURY!! Some authors have gone so far as to suggest exactly that. This is patently absurd! CONCLUSION The Shroud of Turin is a genuine artifact of a first century Roman crucifixion of an adult Jewish male. The radiocarbon dating placing the manufacture of the linen in the 14th century was flawed by extrinsic C14 accumulated over centuries of fungal growth, candle smoke and the intense heat of the fire of 1532. There is NO paint on the linen of the shroud and is not the artifice of a forger.
Views: 7882 Dr0pDuckC0ver
New Documentary about the Shroud of Turin
 
05:48
There are very few Christian relics as important and as controversial as the Shroud of Turin.This linen cloth, measuring about 4.4m by 1.1m (14.4x3.6 feet) holds the concealed image of a man bearing all the signs of crucifixion.Scientific tests have proved that there are blood stains around the marks consistent with a crown of thorns and a puncture from a lance to the side.In a new documentary, we have been given intimate access that no other broadcaster has had before. Until the 1980s, millions of Christians around the world believed the Shroud to be the burial cloth of Christ. Put simply, it meant that for millions of people the Shroud was, in effect, a Polaroid of Jesus' death - a snapshot of the defining moment in Christianity. It put the Shroud in a league of its own in the realm of the most important Christian relics. But in 1989, the significance of the Shroud seemed to evaporate after a radiocarbon dating test pronounced a stunning verdict - the Shroud of Turin was indisputably a medieval fake. With that judgement the extraordinary story of the Shroud of Turin fell out of the public imagination. After all, how could any other kind of evidence about the shroud compare to the verdict of science? But the amazing story of the Shroud of Turin has simply refused to fade into obscurity and die, for the simple reason that a conflict of evidence has emerged which is about the re-ignite the debate around this compelling religious artefact.If it is a medieval forgery, then how was this image made? This documentary try to answer this and other questions.
Taphonomy: Dinosaur Fossil Burial
 
02:26
The arrangement of dinosaur fossils in the ground and the type of rock in which they are found can help paleontologists learn about the circumstances surrounding death.
Views: 5974 paleoed
The Burial Cloth of Jesus
 
10:53
The Hungary Prayer Manuscript of 1192 illustrates what can only be the Shroud of Turin, predating the earliest possible date of manufacture calculated by the AMS Carbon 14 testing. This paradigm assumes that the radiocarbonists' claim that the Shroud of Turin is a 14th century forgery is correct. It is based on what that conclusion tells us about the forger. It tells us hypothetically that: 1. The forger first painted the bloodstains before he painted the image. 2. The forger integrated forensic qualities to his image that would only be known 20th century science. 3. The forger duplicated blood flow patterns in perfect forensic agreement to blood flow from the wrists at 65° from vertical to suggest the exact crucifixion position of the arms. 4. The forger "painted" the blood flows with genuine group AB blood that he had "spiked" with excessive amounts of bilirubin since the forger knew that severe concussive scourging with a Roman flagrum would cause erythrocyte hemolysis and jaundice. 5. The forger "plotted" the scourge marks on the body of the "man in the shroud" to be consistent under forensic examination with two scourgers of varying height. 6. The forger also duplicated abrasion and compression marks on the scourge wounds of the shoulders to suggest to 20th century forensic examiners that the "man in the shroud" had carried a heavy weight following the scourging. 7. The forger, against all convention of medieval artistry, painted the body he was "hoaxing" as Jesus of Nazareth, nude to conform to genuine Roman crucifixions. 8. The forger, as the forensic genius he was, illustrated the nails of crucifixion accurately through the wrists rather than the hands as in all other conventional medieval representations. He also took into account that the thumbs of a crucified victim would rotate inward as a result of median nerve damage as the nails passed through the spaces of Destot. 9. The forger was clever enough to "salt" the linen with the pollens of plants indigenous only to the environs of Jerusalem in anticipation of 20th century palynological analysis. 10. The forger was an artist who surpassed the talents of all known artists to the present day, being able to "paint" an anatomically and photographically perfect human image in a photographic negative manner, centuries before photography, and be able to do so without being able to check his work, close up, as he progressed. 11. The forger was able to paint this image with some unknown medium using an unknown technique, 30-40 feet away in order to discern the shadowy image as he continued. 12. The forger was clever enough to depict an adult with an unplaited pony-tail, sidelocks and a beard style consistent with a Jewish male of the 1st century. 13. The forger thought of such minute details as incorporating dirt from the bare feet of the "man in the shroud" consistent with the calcium carbonate soil of the environs of Jerusalem. 14. This forger was such an expert in 20th century biochemistry, medicine, forensic pathology and anatomy, botany, photography and 3-D computer analysis that he has foiled all the efforts of modern science. His unknown and historically unduplicated artistic technique surpasses all great historical artists, making the pale efforts of DaVinci, Michaelangelo, Raphael and Botticelli appear as infantile scribblings. If the Shroud of Turin is a forgery of the 14th century, as the radiocarbonists claim, and not a genuine artifact of the 1st century, all of these qualities of the purported medieval "forger" must be accepted. If the Shroud was "forged" it would have to have been painted. It is an irrefutable fact that there is NO paint or pigment on the Shroud of Turin leaving the only explanation of the technique of the forger to have used "photography" to manufacture the relic in the THIRTEENTH CENTURY!! Some authors have gone so far as to suggest exactly that. This is patently absurd! CONCLUSION The Shroud of Turin is a genuine artifact of a first century Roman crucifixion of an adult Jewish male. The radiocarbon dating placing the manufacture of the linen in the 14th century was flawed by extrinsic C14 accumulated over centuries of fungal growth, candle smoke and the intense heat of the fire of 1532. There is NO paint on the linen of the shroud and is not the artifice of a forger.
Views: 19606 Dr0pDuckC0ver
Working for the Man - Doctor Who - Colony in Space - BBC
 
03:25
Want more Doctor Who? Visit the official Doctor Who channel: http://bit.ly/WWDoctorWho Doctor Who The home of Doctor Who on YouTube with clips dating back from 1963, all the way through dozens of regenerations, to the latest clips of the Peter Capaldi era and the announcement of Jodie Whittaker as the Thirteenth Doctor: http://bit.ly/WWDoctorWho There's the promise of a good bonus - and a clear pecking order established in this clip from 1970's classic, Colony in Space. Doctor Who YouTube Channel http://www.youtube.com/user/doctorwho Doctor Who Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/DoctorWho Doctor Who Twitter https://twitter.com/bbcdoctorwho
Views: 6078 BBC Studios
ERRATA
 
01:29
Corrections to the 'History of the Universe Made Easy" videos. (Music: "Ladeira do Pelo" by Banda Mel)
Views: 78427 potholer54
rock star beat it
 
00:11
for luara
Views: 18 tresiornigel
Helium 5
 
00:08
helium is bad for you
Views: 59 graacciiee
Creationists telling lies to little children
 
09:22
Creationists twisting scientific facts for their own 'cause'. Even ignoring and trying to cover up the sign explaining C14 Radiocarbondating. People please think for yourself, except no dogmas and learn about all the facts before you make up your mind about things.
Views: 857 QuantumBabe
The Ex- Douchebag's Banshee
 
00:31
The piece of shit I was dating just rebuilt his banshee and just HAD to start it! :D
Views: 111406 Sarah Bennett
where is the evidence for evolution in the fossil record?? 5-7
 
10:02
Geologist Dr.Patton Ph.D quotes evolution scientists who discuss the critical nature of the age of earth to the evolution theory. Experts in the fields of radiometric, radiocarbon and the geologic record dating discuss the assumptions and validity of such dating processes. The age of the earth is pivotal to how we view the Bible. If evolution is correct, than the divine inspiration of scripture is doubtful. Many "Christians" seem to hold the view that the account in Genesis is just a nice myth. Some feel that a "day" does not mean a 24 hour period. Dr. Patton illustrates that those who hold such views cannot believe what the bible teaches. There is no compromise between creation and evolution. Anti-Creationist, William D. Stansfield Professor of Biological Sciences at California Polytechnic State University describes evidence that supports the theory of a young earth. The fossil record in fact seems to support creation as opposed to evolution. No new phyla have appeared since the Cambrian explosion according to Stephen Gould. Significant change from species to species is not evident from the fossil record. The alternative explanation of punctuated equilibrium utilizes mechanisms that are not observed in fact such a theory may in fact support the creation model more than evolution. This first installament lays the foundation of all other discussions relating to Creation Science and Evolution. Experts agree that there are only two possibilities as to the origins of man: Evolution and Creation. While evolution is being taught in our schools, there is no mandate that forbids teachers from presenting material on creation science. Science requires all of its theories to adhere to principles of Observeability, Repeatability, and Falsifiability. Observations of bacteria mutations seem to support abrupt change rather than slow change over a long period of time. Bacteria today as compared to cells in fossils look very much alike. These cells are far from primitive cells. In fact each bacteria cell contains enough genetic information to fill 1,000 Encyclopedia Britannicas. Since bacteria (a cell that rapidly mutates) today has not changed over time, Darwin's theory is broken. Here Dr. Patton discusses the laws of thermodynamics and demonstrates that evolution seems to contradict these laws. The 2nd Law tells us that everything tends to get more disorganized whereas evolution seems to depict a system that goes from an unorganized state to a more complex, highly organized state. We observe in nature that all processes are deteriorating. There must be a beginning state, a state from which all things begin to get disorganized. Evolution does not answer that observation, only creation provides any insight. Fossil "Man" including Rampithecus, Australopithecus have been shown as apes not men. Neanderthal and Cro-Magnon are men. Man is "older" than some of his ancestors, according to the 1470 skull and other fossil finds. Dating the earth using the geological column uses circular logic according to many experts. Human footprints have been found inside of dinasaur prints in Paluxy, Texas. The fossil record indicates a sudden, universal catastrophe, many contemporary geologists believe. Finally, Dr. Patton discusses alternative explanations to the evolution theory.
Views: 1410 JesusLostChildren777
Case for a Creator 1 of 6
 
10:16
The Case for a Creator: A Journalist Investigates Scientific Evidence That Points Toward God: with Lee Strobel
Views: 451 caseforacreator
Complexity (Chapter 6 of 6)
 
05:41
Just three particles and the forces that cause them to interact give rise to all of the incredible and wonderful complexity that makes this universe such an interesting place.
Views: 12189 cassiopeiaproject
Comfortable cheating
 
01:17
Dan Ariely. Predictably Irrational, Behavioral Economics, Cheating
Views: 2679 Dan Ariely
where is the evidence for evolution in the fossil record?? 2-7
 
10:02
Geologist Dr.Patton Ph.D quotes evolution scientists who discuss the critical nature of the age of earth to the evolution theory. Experts in the fields of radiometric, radiocarbon and the geologic record dating discuss the assumptions and validity of such dating processes. The age of the earth is pivotal to how we view the Bible. If evolution is correct, than the divine inspiration of scripture is doubtful. Many "Christians" seem to hold the view that the account in Genesis is just a nice myth. Some feel that a "day" does not mean a 24 hour period. Dr. Patton illustrates that those who hold such views cannot believe what the bible teaches. There is no compromise between creation and evolution. Anti-Creationist, William D. Stansfield Professor of Biological Sciences at California Polytechnic State University describes evidence that supports the theory of a young earth. The fossil record in fact seems to support creation as opposed to evolution. No new phyla have appeared since the Cambrian explosion according to Stephen Gould. Significant change from species to species is not evident from the fossil record. The alternative explanation of punctuated equilibrium utilizes mechanisms that are not observed in fact such a theory may in fact support the creation model more than evolution. This first installament lays the foundation of all other discussions relating to Creation Science and Evolution. Experts agree that there are only two possibilities as to the origins of man: Evolution and Creation. While evolution is being taught in our schools, there is no mandate that forbids teachers from presenting material on creation science. Science requires all of its theories to adhere to principles of Observeability, Repeatability, and Falsifiability. Observations of bacteria mutations seem to support abrupt change rather than slow change over a long period of time. Bacteria today as compared to cells in fossils look very much alike. These cells are far from primitive cells. In fact each bacteria cell contains enough genetic information to fill 1,000 Encyclopedia Britannicas. Since bacteria (a cell that rapidly mutates) today has not changed over time, Darwin's theory is broken. Here Dr. Patton discusses the laws of thermodynamics and demonstrates that evolution seems to contradict these laws. The 2nd Law tells us that everything tends to get more disorganized whereas evolution seems to depict a system that goes from an unorganized state to a more complex, highly organized state. We observe in nature that all processes are deteriorating. There must be a beginning state, a state from which all things begin to get disorganized. Evolution does not answer that observation, only creation provides any insight. Fossil "Man" including Rampithecus, Australopithecus have been shown as apes not men. Neanderthal and Cro-Magnon are men. Man is "older" than some of his ancestors, according to the 1470 skull and other fossil finds. Dating the earth using the geological column uses circular logic according to many experts. Human footprints have been found inside of dinasaur prints in Paluxy, Texas. The fossil record indicates a sudden, universal catastrophe, many contemporary geologists believe. Finally, Dr. Patton discusses alternative explanations to the evolution theory.
Views: 2291 JesusLostChildren777
Why Don't Bees Go to Heaven? - Creationism explained - Save the Enlightenment
 
03:17
The Bee at Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Why-Dont-Bees-Go-To-Heaven-Creationism-explained/118545974907673 Available at iTunes: Video: https://itunes.apple.com/us/music-video/why-dont-bees-go-to-heaven/id372739479 Audio: https://itunes.apple.com/us/album/neo-retro-show-ep/id280161960 Ringtone: Purchase via iPhone http://vimeo.com/channels/savetheenlightenment The Bee's ten suggestions to assist in saving The Enlightenment: 10:1 Look no further for 'miracles' than that of your own consciousness—your existence—it is a privilege absolutely beyond description. 10:2 Regard yourself as neither superior nor inferior to anything within the Infinite Universe—merely a part of it. 10:3 Avoid needlessly extinguishing life or disturbing natural order within the Infinite Universe—take from it no more than you need. 10:4 The Profound is all around. 10:5 The longevity of your conscious existence is balanced between random chance and your own actions. 10:6 Without exception, every word of every text that exists, has existed or will exist is the product of Human thought. 10:7 Partake freely from the ever-deepening well of Human knowledge and wisdom contained within the written word. 10:8 One moment of remorse is worth more than a lifetime of useless guilt—be aware of, and reflect upon, your innate primatial instincts—nice to nasty. 10:9 As far as practically possible, follow a herbivorous-leaning Palaeolithic-inspired diet, while choosing to utilize self-powered mobility at every opportunity. 10:10 To ultimately survive, the species Homo sapiens must break its curse of delusional Anthropocentrism.
Views: 14006 Ron Williams
Shroud of Turin (part 1)
 
08:42
A historical backgrounder on the Shroud of Turin, believed to be the burial cloth of Jesus. "The Shroud is a challenge to our intelligence... The Church urges that the Shroud be studied without pre-established positions that take for granted results that are not such... For the believer, what counts above all is that the Shroud is a mirror of the Gospel... The image of human suffering is reflected in the Shroud... The Shroud is also an image of God's love as well as of human sin... (of) the powerlessness of death.. of silence....The Shroud shows Jesus at the moment of his greatest helplessness and reminds us that in the abasement of death lies the salvation of the whole world" (John Paul II in the 1998 Exposition of the Shroud of Turin). This video is from the official website of the Philippine exhibit which started last July 2007 (http://www.shroudexhibits.ph/main/#).
Views: 216300 Fr. Raul Asuncion
Expelled Debunk - Flunked 10of16
 
09:16
Expelled makes some outrageous claims. But what really happened to the people they claim were persecuted for their views? And what is the real story about evolution and Intelligent Design? In practically every scene, Expelled insults the science of evolution and the scientists who study it, accepting the long-ago-debunked criticisms and conspiracy theories of the intelligent design proponents as valid. On the contrary, evolution is well accepted in the scientific community, where it is considered the organizing principle of biology and central as well to the field of geology. The notion that scientists have formed an atheistic cabal to keep intelligent design from its day in the sun is ludicrous. Intelligent design has not produced any research to suppress. When prominent ID proponent Michael Behe was asked about his research, and why "you don't do those tests?" he responded, "I myself would prefer to spend time in what I would consider to be more fruitful endeavors." If even proponents of ID do not think it is a fruitful enterprise, why should the scientific community take any interest in it? Intelligent design is scientifically unproductive, and this perhaps explains why scientists like Guillermo Gonzalez and Michael Behe publish far fewer papers after they become attracted to intelligent design. Ultimately, intelligent design's lack of success in science departments is the fault of the flawed and unscientific nature of intelligent design itself, not the result of bias in the scientific community. The issue is not the suppression of ID, but the lack of warrant for its scientific claims. And ultimately, ID has an uphill struggle to demonstrate that it is, indeed, science. The fundamental problem with intelligent design as science is that intelligent design claims cannot be tested. Scientific testing requires that there be some set of phenomena which are incompatible with your idea. No observation could possibly be incompatible with a claim that an "intelligent agent" (whom everyone recognizes as God) acted to, say, introduce information into a system. Untestable claims are not scientific claims. Regardless of their attractiveness as religious ideas (although many people of faith strongly reject intelligent design) intelligent design has not passed muster as science. Flunked - Expelled Debunked by PrometheusWithLight http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=A3D6C9C847F27E6F http://www.youtube.com/PrometheusWithLight http://www.expelledexposed.com
Views: 8453 djarm67
Jon Jackson overview of the Shroud of Jesus
 
05:57
Harold Cohen interviews Jon Jackson he Hungary Prayer Manuscript of 1192 illustrates what can only be the Shroud of Turin, predating the earliest possible date of manufacture calculated by the AMS Carbon 14 testing. All of what I have explained above can be found in the voluminous scientific and popular literature on the shroud of Turin. At this point, I would like to offer a different paradigm for assessing the accuracy of the 14th century date and the resulting claim that the shroud is the work of a 14th century forger. Again, this article is not addressing the issue of whether or not the Shroud of Turin was the burial cloth of Jesus of Nazareth and its value as a "relic" of Christianity. It addresses only whether the shroud is a genuine archaeological artifact of a 1st century crucifixion. This paradigm assumes that the radiocarbonists' claim that the Shroud of Turin is a 14th century forgery is correct. It is based on what that conclusion tells us about the forger. It tells us that: 1. The forger first painted the bloodstains before he painted the image. 2. The forger integrated forensic qualities to his image that would only be known 20th century science. 3. The forger duplicated blood flow patterns in perfect forensic agreement to blood flow from the wrists at 65° from vertical to suggest the exact crucifixion position of the arms. 4. The forger "painted" the blood flows with genuine group AB blood that he had "spiked" with excessive amounts of bilirubin since the forger knew that severe concussive scourging with a Roman flagrum would cause erythrocyte hemolysis and jaundice. 5. The forger "plotted" the scourge marks on the body of the "man in the shroud" to be consistent under forensic examination with two scourgers of varying height. 6. The forger also duplicated abrasion and compression marks on the scourge wounds of the shoulders to suggest to 20th century forensic examiners that the "man in the shroud" had carried a heavy weight following the scourging. 7. The forger, against all convention of medieval artistry, painted the body he was "hoaxing" as Jesus of Nazareth, nude to conform to genuine Roman crucifixions. 8. The forger, as the forensic genius he was, illustrated the nails of crucifixion accurately through the wrists rather than the hands as in all other conventional medieval representations. He also took into account that the thumbs of a crucified victim would rotate inward as a result of median nerve damage as the nails passed through the spaces of Destot. 9. The forger was clever enough to "salt" the linen with the pollens of plants indigenous only to the environs of Jerusalem in anticipation of 20th century palynological analysis. 10. The forger was an artist who surpassed the talents of all known artists to the present day, being able to "paint" an anatomically and photographically perfect human image in a photographic negative manner, centuries before photography, and be able to do so without being able to check his work, close up, as he progressed. 11. The forger was able to paint this image with some unknown medium using an unknown technique, 30-40 feet away in order to discern the shadowy image as he continued. 12. The forger was clever enough to depict an adult with an unplaited pony-tail, sidelocks and a beard style consistent with a Jewish male of the 1st century. 13. The forger thought of such minute details as incorporating dirt from the bare feet of the "man in the shroud" consistent with the calcium carbonate soil of the environs of Jerusalem. 14. This forger was such an expert in 20th century biochemistry, medicine, forensic pathology and anatomy, botany, photography and 3-D computer analysis that he has foiled all the efforts of modern science. His unknown and historically unduplicated artistic technique surpasses all great historical artists, making the pale efforts of DaVinci, Michaelangelo, Raphael and Botticelli appear as infantile scribblings. If the Shroud of Turin is a forgery of the 14th century, as the radiocarbonists claim, and not a genuine artifact of the 1st century, all of these qualities of the purported medieval "forger" must be accepted. If the Shroud was "forged" it would have to have been painted. It is an irrefutable fact that there is NO paint or pigment on the Shroud of Turin leaving the only explanation of the technique of the forger to have used "photography" to manufacture the relic in the THIRTEENTH CENTURY!! Some authors have gone so far as to suggest exactly that. This is patently absurd! CONCLUSION The Shroud of Turin is a genuine artifact of a first century Roman crucifixion of an adult Jewish male. The radiocarbon dating placing the manufacture of the linen in the 14th century was flawed by extrinsic C14 accumulated over centuries of fungal growth, candle smoke and the intense heat of the fire of 1532. There is NO paint on the linen of the shroud and is not the artifice of a forger.
Views: 2354 Dr0pDuckC0ver
One Atheist's Creed
 
02:52
Following on from my video 'Atheists are immoral - debunked', I have an answer to fundamentalists who tell me that atheists have no beliefs and no purpose in life. I have both, and here they are. Since this was posted, one of my subscribers has suggested a few amendements, which I heartily endorse: 1) "Not because I am told to, or afraid of being punished if I don't, but because I desire others to be honest and compassionate towards me." 3) I believe everyone has a right to freedom of speech, freedom of thought, freedom of religion, and freedom from religion. 7) I will not fill gaps in knowledge with speculation or blind belief. All much better than my original. (Music: 'Blackwaterside' by Fotheringay)
Views: 69460 Potholer54debunks
Un-safe Sex
 
01:36
SIGN UP FOR DROPOUT.TV, available WORLDWIDE: https://bit.ly/2FdSxcO App available in Canada, Australia, New Zealand and the U.S. Get CollegeHumor straight to your inbox! https://www.collegehumor.com/static/newsletter SECRET GAY AGENDA http://bit.ly/MXBPrP LIKE us on: http://www.facebook.com/collegehumor Love is in the air in "Checkin' For Gas 5," CollegeHumor's first porno. See more http://www.collegehumor.com FOLLOW us on: http://www.twitter.com/collegehumor FOLLOW us on: http://www.collegehumor.tumblr.com
Views: 39026151 CollegeHumor