Home
Search results “All about carbon dating” for the 2008
Radiometric Dating
 
07:10
A video from the New Zealand E=Mc2 website regarding radiometric dating. Full article and more videos- http://www.eequalsmcsquared.auckland.ac.nz/sites/emc2/videos/cool-kiwi-science.cfm
Views: 90302 stevebd1
Carbon Dating
 
01:00
Rsa Project.
Views: 4115 jamiedesign
Carbon Dating the Toast
 
01:46
Song. In my head this has all sorts of orchestration and instrumentation and is arranged beautifuly. In reality it's me and a pink ukulele. I have had no end of computer problems trying to make this so it is a bit jumpy at times. I have posted it now just so I don't have to keep fiddling with it. It's hard to make things when you just have windows movie maker and an old PC with hardly any memory! Music and Lyrics, Elise Harris.
Views: 2913 Elise Harris
The Shroud and the Carbon Dating Debate
 
03:50
http://www.shroud.com has the latest on the upcoming public showing of the shroud in 2010 and new C-14 testings. If one assumes that the radiocarbonists' claim that the Shroud of Turin is a 14th century forgery is correct. It is based on what that conclusion tells us about the forger. It tells us that: 1. The forger first painted the bloodstains before he painted the image. 2. The forger integrated forensic qualities to his image that would only be known 20th century science. 3. The forger duplicated blood flow patterns in perfect forensic agreement to blood flow from the wrists at 65° from vertical to suggest the exact crucifixion position of the arms. 4. The forger "painted" the blood flows with genuine group AB blood that he had "spiked" with excessive amounts of bilirubin since the forger knew that severe concussive scourging with a Roman flagrum would cause erythrocyte hemolysis and jaundice. 5. The forger "plotted" the scourge marks on the body of the "man in the shroud" to be consistent under forensic examination with two scourgers of varying height. 6. The forger also duplicated abrasion and compression marks on the scourge wounds of the shoulders to suggest to 20th century forensic examiners that the "man in the shroud" had carried a heavy weight following the scourging. 7. The forger, against all convention of medieval artistry, painted the body he was "hoaxing" as Jesus of Nazareth, nude to conform to genuine Roman crucifixions. 8. The forger, as the forensic genius he was, illustrated the nails of crucifixion accurately through the wrists rather than the hands as in all other conventional medieval representations. He also took into account that the thumbs of a crucified victim would rotate inward as a result of median nerve damage as the nails passed through the spaces of Destot. 9. The forger was clever enough to "salt" the linen with the pollens of plants indigenous only to the environs of Jerusalem in anticipation of 20th century palynological analysis. 10. The forger was an artist who surpassed the talents of all known artists to the present day, being able to "paint" an anatomically and photographically perfect human image in a photographic negative manner, centuries before photography, and be able to do so without being able to check his work, close up, as he progressed. 11. The forger was able to paint this image with some unknown medium using an unknown technique, 30-40 feet away in order to discern the shadowy image as he continued. 12. The forger was clever enough to depict an adult with an unplaited pony-tail, sidelocks and a beard style consistent with a Jewish male of the 1st century. 13. The forger thought of such minute details as incorporating dirt from the bare feet of the "man in the shroud" consistent with the calcium carbonate soil of the environs of Jerusalem. 14. This forger was such an expert in 20th century biochemistry, medicine, forensic pathology and anatomy, botany, photography and 3-D computer analysis that he has foiled all the efforts of modern science. His unknown and historically unduplicated artistic technique surpasses all great historical artists, making the pale efforts of DaVinci, Michaelangelo, Raphael and Botticelli appear as infantile scribblings. If the Shroud of Turin is a forgery of the 14th century, as the radiocarbonists claim, and not a genuine artifact of the 1st century, all of these qualities of the purported medieval "forger" must be accepted. If the Shroud was "forged" it would have to have been painted. It is an irrefutable fact that there is NO paint or pigment on the Shroud of Turin leaving the only explanation of the technique of the forger to have used "photography" to manufacture the relic in the THIRTEENTH CENTURY!! Some authors have gone so far as to suggest exactly that. This is patently absurd! CONCLUSION The Shroud of Turin is a genuine artifact of a first century Roman crucifixion of an adult Jewish male. The radiocarbon dating placing the manufacture of the linen in the 14th century was flawed by extrinsic C14 accumulated over centuries of fungal growth, candle smoke and the intense heat of the fire of 1532. There is NO paint on the linen of the shroud and is not the artifice of a forger.
Views: 2952 Dr0pDuckC0ver
RE: Most important video ever made (4 of 4)
 
01:00
last tidbit that didn't fit on the others. Thanks for all the responses. CORRECTIONS: pt1. Carbon dating can not be used to date a T-rex bone. C-14 works to about 50,000 years ago. T-Rex is 65-68M years old.
Views: 494 happysplodie
where is the evidence for evolution in the fossil record?? 5-7
 
10:02
Geologist Dr.Patton Ph.D quotes evolution scientists who discuss the critical nature of the age of earth to the evolution theory. Experts in the fields of radiometric, radiocarbon and the geologic record dating discuss the assumptions and validity of such dating processes. The age of the earth is pivotal to how we view the Bible. If evolution is correct, than the divine inspiration of scripture is doubtful. Many "Christians" seem to hold the view that the account in Genesis is just a nice myth. Some feel that a "day" does not mean a 24 hour period. Dr. Patton illustrates that those who hold such views cannot believe what the bible teaches. There is no compromise between creation and evolution. Anti-Creationist, William D. Stansfield Professor of Biological Sciences at California Polytechnic State University describes evidence that supports the theory of a young earth. The fossil record in fact seems to support creation as opposed to evolution. No new phyla have appeared since the Cambrian explosion according to Stephen Gould. Significant change from species to species is not evident from the fossil record. The alternative explanation of punctuated equilibrium utilizes mechanisms that are not observed in fact such a theory may in fact support the creation model more than evolution. This first installament lays the foundation of all other discussions relating to Creation Science and Evolution. Experts agree that there are only two possibilities as to the origins of man: Evolution and Creation. While evolution is being taught in our schools, there is no mandate that forbids teachers from presenting material on creation science. Science requires all of its theories to adhere to principles of Observeability, Repeatability, and Falsifiability. Observations of bacteria mutations seem to support abrupt change rather than slow change over a long period of time. Bacteria today as compared to cells in fossils look very much alike. These cells are far from primitive cells. In fact each bacteria cell contains enough genetic information to fill 1,000 Encyclopedia Britannicas. Since bacteria (a cell that rapidly mutates) today has not changed over time, Darwin's theory is broken. Here Dr. Patton discusses the laws of thermodynamics and demonstrates that evolution seems to contradict these laws. The 2nd Law tells us that everything tends to get more disorganized whereas evolution seems to depict a system that goes from an unorganized state to a more complex, highly organized state. We observe in nature that all processes are deteriorating. There must be a beginning state, a state from which all things begin to get disorganized. Evolution does not answer that observation, only creation provides any insight. Fossil "Man" including Rampithecus, Australopithecus have been shown as apes not men. Neanderthal and Cro-Magnon are men. Man is "older" than some of his ancestors, according to the 1470 skull and other fossil finds. Dating the earth using the geological column uses circular logic according to many experts. Human footprints have been found inside of dinasaur prints in Paluxy, Texas. The fossil record indicates a sudden, universal catastrophe, many contemporary geologists believe. Finally, Dr. Patton discusses alternative explanations to the evolution theory.
Views: 1408 JesusLostChildren777
where is the evidence for evolution in the fossil record??  4-7
 
10:07
Geologist Dr.Patton Ph.D quotes evolution scientists who discuss the critical nature of the age of earth to the evolution theory. Experts in the fields of radiometric, radiocarbon and the geologic record dating discuss the assumptions and validity of such dating processes. The age of the earth is pivotal to how we view the Bible. If evolution is correct, than the divine inspiration of scripture is doubtful. Many "Christians" seem to hold the view that the account in Genesis is just a nice myth. Some feel that a "day" does not mean a 24 hour period. Dr. Patton illustrates that those who hold such views cannot believe what the bible teaches. There is no compromise between creation and evolution. Anti-Creationist, William D. Stansfield Professor of Biological Sciences at California Polytechnic State University describes evidence that supports the theory of a young earth. The fossil record in fact seems to support creation as opposed to evolution. No new phyla have appeared since the Cambrian explosion according to Stephen Gould. Significant change from species to species is not evident from the fossil record. The alternative explanation of punctuated equilibrium utilizes mechanisms that are not observed in fact such a theory may in fact support the creation model more than evolution. This first installament lays the foundation of all other discussions relating to Creation Science and Evolution. Experts agree that there are only two possibilities as to the origins of man: Evolution and Creation. While evolution is being taught in our schools, there is no mandate that forbids teachers from presenting material on creation science. Science requires all of its theories to adhere to principles of Observeability, Repeatability, and Falsifiability. Observations of bacteria mutations seem to support abrupt change rather than slow change over a long period of time. Bacteria today as compared to cells in fossils look very much alike. These cells are far from primitive cells. In fact each bacteria cell contains enough genetic information to fill 1,000 Encyclopedia Britannicas. Since bacteria (a cell that rapidly mutates) today has not changed over time, Darwin's theory is broken. Here Dr. Patton discusses the laws of thermodynamics and demonstrates that evolution seems to contradict these laws. The 2nd Law tells us that everything tends to get more disorganized whereas evolution seems to depict a system that goes from an unorganized state to a more complex, highly organized state. We observe in nature that all processes are deteriorating. There must be a beginning state, a state from which all things begin to get disorganized. Evolution does not answer that observation, only creation provides any insight. Fossil "Man" including Rampithecus, Australopithecus have been shown as apes not men. Neanderthal and Cro-Magnon are men. Man is "older" than some of his ancestors, according to the 1470 skull and other fossil finds. Dating the earth using the geological column uses circular logic according to many experts. Human footprints have been found inside of dinasaur prints in Paluxy, Texas. The fossil record indicates a sudden, universal catastrophe, many contemporary geologists believe. Finally, Dr. Patton discusses alternative explanations to the evolution theory.
Views: 2326 JesusLostChildren777
9 - Human Ancestry Made Easy
 
09:16
This video traces our migration out of Africa and explains, through DNA evidence, how humans colonized the world. It is part of the Made Easy series of videos that show the evidence of our origins, from the Big Bang onwards. (Music: "Allegretto" by Bond and "The Ballad of Henry Darger" by Natalie Merchant.)
Views: 200815 potholer54
where is the evidence for evolution in the fossil record?? 2-7
 
10:02
Geologist Dr.Patton Ph.D quotes evolution scientists who discuss the critical nature of the age of earth to the evolution theory. Experts in the fields of radiometric, radiocarbon and the geologic record dating discuss the assumptions and validity of such dating processes. The age of the earth is pivotal to how we view the Bible. If evolution is correct, than the divine inspiration of scripture is doubtful. Many "Christians" seem to hold the view that the account in Genesis is just a nice myth. Some feel that a "day" does not mean a 24 hour period. Dr. Patton illustrates that those who hold such views cannot believe what the bible teaches. There is no compromise between creation and evolution. Anti-Creationist, William D. Stansfield Professor of Biological Sciences at California Polytechnic State University describes evidence that supports the theory of a young earth. The fossil record in fact seems to support creation as opposed to evolution. No new phyla have appeared since the Cambrian explosion according to Stephen Gould. Significant change from species to species is not evident from the fossil record. The alternative explanation of punctuated equilibrium utilizes mechanisms that are not observed in fact such a theory may in fact support the creation model more than evolution. This first installament lays the foundation of all other discussions relating to Creation Science and Evolution. Experts agree that there are only two possibilities as to the origins of man: Evolution and Creation. While evolution is being taught in our schools, there is no mandate that forbids teachers from presenting material on creation science. Science requires all of its theories to adhere to principles of Observeability, Repeatability, and Falsifiability. Observations of bacteria mutations seem to support abrupt change rather than slow change over a long period of time. Bacteria today as compared to cells in fossils look very much alike. These cells are far from primitive cells. In fact each bacteria cell contains enough genetic information to fill 1,000 Encyclopedia Britannicas. Since bacteria (a cell that rapidly mutates) today has not changed over time, Darwin's theory is broken. Here Dr. Patton discusses the laws of thermodynamics and demonstrates that evolution seems to contradict these laws. The 2nd Law tells us that everything tends to get more disorganized whereas evolution seems to depict a system that goes from an unorganized state to a more complex, highly organized state. We observe in nature that all processes are deteriorating. There must be a beginning state, a state from which all things begin to get disorganized. Evolution does not answer that observation, only creation provides any insight. Fossil "Man" including Rampithecus, Australopithecus have been shown as apes not men. Neanderthal and Cro-Magnon are men. Man is "older" than some of his ancestors, according to the 1470 skull and other fossil finds. Dating the earth using the geological column uses circular logic according to many experts. Human footprints have been found inside of dinasaur prints in Paluxy, Texas. The fossil record indicates a sudden, universal catastrophe, many contemporary geologists believe. Finally, Dr. Patton discusses alternative explanations to the evolution theory.
Views: 2288 JesusLostChildren777
Its all about carbon
 
08:39
this was an extra credit assignment for mr. ozuna's class....and i did it
Views: 121 zippy98aolcom
where is the evidence for evolution in the fossil record?? 6-7
 
09:58
Geologist Dr.Patton Ph.D quotes evolution scientists who discuss the critical nature of the age of earth to the evolution theory. Experts in the fields of radiometric, radiocarbon and the geologic record dating discuss the assumptions and validity of such dating processes. The age of the earth is pivotal to how we view the Bible. If evolution is correct, than the divine inspiration of scripture is doubtful. Many "Christians" seem to hold the view that the account in Genesis is just a nice myth. Some feel that a "day" does not mean a 24 hour period. Dr. Patton illustrates that those who hold such views cannot believe what the bible teaches. There is no compromise between creation and evolution. Anti-Creationist, William D. Stansfield Professor of Biological Sciences at California Polytechnic State University describes evidence that supports the theory of a young earth. The fossil record in fact seems to support creation as opposed to evolution. No new phyla have appeared since the Cambrian explosion according to Stephen Gould. Significant change from species to species is not evident from the fossil record. The alternative explanation of punctuated equilibrium utilizes mechanisms that are not observed in fact such a theory may in fact support the creation model more than evolution. This first installament lays the foundation of all other discussions relating to Creation Science and Evolution. Experts agree that there are only two possibilities as to the origins of man: Evolution and Creation. While evolution is being taught in our schools, there is no mandate that forbids teachers from presenting material on creation science. Science requires all of its theories to adhere to principles of Observeability, Repeatability, and Falsifiability. Observations of bacteria mutations seem to support abrupt change rather than slow change over a long period of time. Bacteria today as compared to cells in fossils look very much alike. These cells are far from primitive cells. In fact each bacteria cell contains enough genetic information to fill 1,000 Encyclopedia Britannicas. Since bacteria (a cell that rapidly mutates) today has not changed over time, Darwin's theory is broken. Here Dr. Patton discusses the laws of thermodynamics and demonstrates that evolution seems to contradict these laws. The 2nd Law tells us that everything tends to get more disorganized whereas evolution seems to depict a system that goes from an unorganized state to a more complex, highly organized state. We observe in nature that all processes are deteriorating. There must be a beginning state, a state from which all things begin to get disorganized. Evolution does not answer that observation, only creation provides any insight. Fossil "Man" including Rampithecus, Australopithecus have been shown as apes not men. Neanderthal and Cro-Magnon are men. Man is "older" than some of his ancestors, according to the 1470 skull and other fossil finds. Dating the earth using the geological column uses circular logic according to many experts. Human footprints have been found inside of dinasaur prints in Paluxy, Texas. The fossil record indicates a sudden, universal catastrophe, many contemporary geologists believe. Finally, Dr. Patton discusses alternative explanations to the evolution theory.
Views: 1477 JesusLostChildren777
where is the evidence for evolution in the fossil record?? 7-7
 
09:30
Geologist Dr.Patton Ph.D quotes evolution scientists who discuss the critical nature of the age of earth to the evolution theory. Experts in the fields of radiometric, radiocarbon and the geologic record dating discuss the assumptions and validity of such dating processes. The age of the earth is pivotal to how we view the Bible. If evolution is correct, than the divine inspiration of scripture is doubtful. Many "Christians" seem to hold the view that the account in Genesis is just a nice myth. Some feel that a "day" does not mean a 24 hour period. Dr. Patton illustrates that those who hold such views cannot believe what the bible teaches. There is no compromise between creation and evolution. Anti-Creationist, William D. Stansfield Professor of Biological Sciences at California Polytechnic State University describes evidence that supports the theory of a young earth. The fossil record in fact seems to support creation as opposed to evolution. No new phyla have appeared since the Cambrian explosion according to Stephen Gould. Significant change from species to species is not evident from the fossil record. The alternative explanation of punctuated equilibrium utilizes mechanisms that are not observed in fact such a theory may in fact support the creation model more than evolution. This first installament lays the foundation of all other discussions relating to Creation Science and Evolution. Experts agree that there are only two possibilities as to the origins of man: Evolution and Creation. While evolution is being taught in our schools, there is no mandate that forbids teachers from presenting material on creation science. Science requires all of its theories to adhere to principles of Observeability, Repeatability, and Falsifiability. Observations of bacteria mutations seem to support abrupt change rather than slow change over a long period of time. Bacteria today as compared to cells in fossils look very much alike. These cells are far from primitive cells. In fact each bacteria cell contains enough genetic information to fill 1,000 Encyclopedia Britannicas. Since bacteria (a cell that rapidly mutates) today has not changed over time, Darwin's theory is broken. Here Dr. Patton discusses the laws of thermodynamics and demonstrates that evolution seems to contradict these laws. The 2nd Law tells us that everything tends to get more disorganized whereas evolution seems to depict a system that goes from an unorganized state to a more complex, highly organized state. We observe in nature that all processes are deteriorating. There must be a beginning state, a state from which all things begin to get disorganized. Evolution does not answer that observation, only creation provides any insight. Fossil "Man" including Rampithecus, Australopithecus have been shown as apes not men. Neanderthal and Cro-Magnon are men. Man is "older" than some of his ancestors, according to the 1470 skull and other fossil finds. Dating the earth using the geological column uses circular logic according to many experts. Human footprints have been found inside of dinasaur prints in Paluxy, Texas. The fossil record indicates a sudden, universal catastrophe, many contemporary geologists believe. Finally, Dr. Patton discusses alternative explanations to the evolution theory.
Views: 1144 JesusLostChildren777
where is the evidence for evolution in the fossil record?? 3-7
 
09:48
Geologist Dr.Patton Ph.D quotes evolution scientists who discuss the critical nature of the age of earth to the evolution theory. Experts in the fields of radiometric, radiocarbon and the geologic record dating discuss the assumptions and validity of such dating processes. The age of the earth is pivotal to how we view the Bible. If evolution is correct, than the divine inspiration of scripture is doubtful. Many "Christians" seem to hold the view that the account in Genesis is just a nice myth. Some feel that a "day" does not mean a 24 hour period. Dr. Patton illustrates that those who hold such views cannot believe what the bible teaches. There is no compromise between creation and evolution. Anti-Creationist, William D. Stansfield Professor of Biological Sciences at California Polytechnic State University describes evidence that supports the theory of a young earth. The fossil record in fact seems to support creation as opposed to evolution. No new phyla have appeared since the Cambrian explosion according to Stephen Gould. Significant change from species to species is not evident from the fossil record. The alternative explanation of punctuated equilibrium utilizes mechanisms that are not observed in fact such a theory may in fact support the creation model more than evolution. This first installament lays the foundation of all other discussions relating to Creation Science and Evolution. Experts agree that there are only two possibilities as to the origins of man: Evolution and Creation. While evolution is being taught in our schools, there is no mandate that forbids teachers from presenting material on creation science. Science requires all of its theories to adhere to principles of Observeability, Repeatability, and Falsifiability. Observations of bacteria mutations seem to support abrupt change rather than slow change over a long period of time. Bacteria today as compared to cells in fossils look very much alike. These cells are far from primitive cells. In fact each bacteria cell contains enough genetic information to fill 1,000 Encyclopedia Britannicas. Since bacteria (a cell that rapidly mutates) today has not changed over time, Darwin's theory is broken. Here Dr. Patton discusses the laws of thermodynamics and demonstrates that evolution seems to contradict these laws. The 2nd Law tells us that everything tends to get more disorganized whereas evolution seems to depict a system that goes from an unorganized state to a more complex, highly organized state. We observe in nature that all processes are deteriorating. There must be a beginning state, a state from which all things begin to get disorganized. Evolution does not answer that observation, only creation provides any insight. Fossil "Man" including Rampithecus, Australopithecus have been shown as apes not men. Neanderthal and Cro-Magnon are men. Man is "older" than some of his ancestors, according to the 1470 skull and other fossil finds. Dating the earth using the geological column uses circular logic according to many experts. Human footprints have been found inside of dinasaur prints in Paluxy, Texas. The fossil record indicates a sudden, universal catastrophe, many contemporary geologists believe. Finally, Dr. Patton discusses alternative explanations to the evolution theory.
Views: 3553 JesusLostChildren777
Young earth diamond dating
 
02:34
Article from answers in genesis: http://answersingenesis.org/articles/am/v2/n4/radiocarbon-in-diamonds Article of the actual test: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6TJN-4N1T1J7-6&_user=10&_coverDate=06%2F30%2F2007&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=81352d1c6a08af32eee6b45ddd7ae04f
Views: 578 Zucadragon
Jurassic Ark (Before the Flood)
 
09:19
To see the whole seminar of "Dinosaurs and the Bible," click here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZDQL6rF4bE Certain people (like Matt Damon) think its funny that Sarah Palin believes dinosaurs lived 4,000 years ago. Well, first of all, reptiles never stop growing. It's just a simple biological fact that reptiles grow all their life and never stop until the day they die. Well, look at the genealogies from Adam until Noah. People back then lived to be 900 years old, which is more than 10 times longer than the average life span today. Well, it wouldn't just be people would it? More than likely it would be plants, animals, the whole ecosystem. If a lizard's lifespan in Noah's day was about 10 times longer than today (and reptiles never stop growing) then back in Noah's day lizards and reptiles would have gotten huge! Scientists have found fossilized remains of crocodiles that reached up to 40 or 50 feet. Scientists say they are prehistoric, but I don't think so. I think they got so big because they lived so long in the days of Noah. Also, fossilization is caused by flooding. Scientists have found that the conditions that would be most ideal for the kind of massive fossil formations found in the sediments would be a violent, global flood catastrophe. Dinosaur remains worldwide are associated with water-laid sediment. Well, it just so happens that the bible talks about a flood like that. And it just so happens that it occurred in the days when reptiles and lizards would have gotten really really big. So the fact that we're digging up enormous reptiles and lizards up out of the ground, most of which are completely fossilized, this fits into the bible just perfectly. The reason dinosaurs seem to be a problem for people of faith, is because the million year age estimates assigned to dinosaurs by evolutionists are presented to the public in such a way to where they seem to be scientific fact, when in reality they are actually quite theoretical. Not all scientists agree that dinosaurs went extinct millions of years ago. Not even all the dating methods agree with those million year age estimates. And even the dating methods that do agree have been found to be very questionable and many times inaccurate. For instance, according to the Journal of Geophysical Research in 1978, new rock in the form of hardened lava flows produced estimated ages as great as 3 billion to 10.5 billion years, when they were actually less than 200 years old. Does that sound like an accurate age estimate to you? That's not just a minor miscalculation. That's a major, major inaccuracy. However, when you go to the science museum, they show you a skeleton of a Tyrannosaurus Rex and say "This T-Rex lived 160 million years ago!" Okay, obviously someone who has been very invigorated by the shade of Charles Darwin seriously believes that skeleton is millions of years old. I'm not convinced. You know what I find convincing? I think dinosaurs got so big because they lived so long in Noah's day. They fossilized because of the flood waters. That sounds much more logical to me. Creation Scientists suspect that dinosaurs did not become extinct until about 3 or 4 thousand years ago. If you carbon date a dinosaur bone that has carbon in it, then you'll find it to be only a few thousand years old. Well, that makes sense, because the flood occurred about 4,400 years ago. However, Evolutionists won't carbon date dinosaur bones that contain carbon, because they know carbon dating will give them an age estimate of only a few thousand years. Well, that doesn't match their assumption of millions of years. So what they'll do is, they won't even bother to carbon date dinosaur bones. Instead they'll use alternative forms of radiometric dating like potassium-argon or uranium-lead, or some other form of radiometric dating which will give them the million year age estimates that they're looking for, based upon their pre-conceived idea of evolution. However, these alternative dating methods were the same ones used to give a rock less than 200 years old an age estimate of around 3 billion years (according to the Journal of Geophysical Research, 1978) To see the whole seminar of "Dinosaurs and the Bible," click here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZDQL6rF4bE Sources: "The Illustrated Origins Answer Book" by Paul S. Taylor. (Page 12, right hand column, 5th paragraph, 2nd sentence). Look it up. Dr. Duane Gish (PhD in biochemistry) Dr. Kent Hovind Ken Ham "Scientific Facts in the Bible" by Ray Comfort. (Page 80) http://www.creationmuseum.org/
Views: 32557 NathanH83
Dating: a film about dating
 
08:28
Boise LDS Institute film festival 2008 participant. awesome. we just got to thinking about why dating in the church is sometimes lacking and then decided to make a video. it's supposed to be funny, not a really serious documentary. feel free to laugh...if you feel the need.
Views: 1056 Emily Hansen
Chemical Party
 
01:33
Very funny clip explaining why noble gases do not bond ;-) and why Potassium and Water lead to explosive reactions. REALLY GREAT! http://www.ec.europa.eu/research/mariecurieactions
Views: 2244630 addyson99
Shanghai Souvenir
 
00:33
This is a beautiful item I picked up at Yu Yuan in Shanghai. The Chinese says "Shanghai souvenir", the music is Carbon Dating by the Super Furry Animals
Views: 1212 swissjames
Stephen Fry puts Alan in his place - Qi - BBC
 
03:06
Alan Davies gets stunned with an intellectual put-down from Stephen Fry in this hilarious clip from QI. From BBC Worldwide.
Views: 2623939 BBC Studios
1. Climate Change -- the scientific debate
 
10:42
A basic look at how climate scientists infer that man-made carbon gases are changing the climate, and how this view is contradicted by other climate scientists who are skeptics. I am a former science correspondent with an interest in reporting the facts, not the media hype. My thanks to 9thgate for checking my script for errors. Please note that the animation of a photon striking a carbon atom is not meant to be visually correct, it is simply an illustration of CO2 absorbing energy and re-emitting it at a different wavelength. Given the limitations I have in making animations I could not spend an inordinate amount of time making a visually "correct" image of a photon striking an electron which moves into a different orbital plane, and even if I tried it would never be visually correct because on a quantum scale such an illustration is impossible. But thanks to all those who wrote in. The narration that accompanies the illustration is correct.
Views: 433687 potholer54
Radiation Collection (2 of 2) Carbon-14 & Cesium-137
 
05:50
More of my collection, consisting of Carbon-14 and Cesium-137, 10uCi of each! (I will not be answering any inquiries about where I got them, but they are legal!) Music- Nine Inch Nails - Survivalism - Year Zero Nine Inch Nails - God Given - Year Zero
Views: 3226 AScannerClearly
what is carbon offset
 
02:18
カーボンオフセットアニメーション
Views: 957 ecoreso2008
Archaeologists Unearth Oldest Hebrew Text
 
02:33
Israeli archaeologists claim to have unearthed the oldest Hebrew text ever found. Discovered while excavating a fortress city, apparently it dates back from the 10th century B.C. and refers to the Bible when King David slew Goliath. Here's more on the story. STORY: Archaeologists uncover Israel's most foregone past near the ancient battlefield in the Valley of Elah. It is now home to wineries and a satellite station. The professor of archaeology at the Hebrew University led the excavations. [Yosef Garfinkel, Archaeology Professor]: "This inscription...is the oldest Hebrew inscription in the world. It's pre-dated the Dead Sea Scrolls by 1,000 years." Experts have not been able to decipher the full text as yet, but several words, including "judge", "slave" and "king," were identified. They hope the text will shed light on how alphabetic scripts developed. [Yosef Garfinkel, Archaeology Professor]: "It is written in Proto-Canaanite script which is the father and mother of all the alphabetic script in the world, the Greek, the Latin, the Hebrew, the Phoenician, the Aramein (Aramaic), all the alphabet in the world derived from this script that appears here on this specific piece of pottery." Carbon dating of artifacts found at the site indicate the Hebrew inscription was written about 10th century B.C. This is a time when scholars believe King David ruled Jerusalem and ancient Israel. [Yosef Garfinkel, Archaeology Professor]: "This inscription was found in a site... located on the border between Judah and the Philistine. It was a fortified city from the time of King David, about 3,000 years ago." Garfinkel says the recent findings could have wider repercussions over the future of Jerusalem. [Yosef Garfunkel, Archaeology Professor]: "Currently there is a heated debate about the historical value of the Bible-if we have historical information, or it's only theological and literary composed hundreds of years later. Our site clearly proves that already in the early 10th century B.C. there was a kingdom in Judea and that King David existed as a king and that he built fortified cities." Modern-day Israel often mentions a biblical connection through King David to Jerusalem in supporting its claim to all of the city as its "eternal and indivisible capital." For the Palestinians, however, the long-standing Arab population in Jerusalem takes over any biblical claims. They want the eastern part of the city to be the capital of the state they hope to establish in the West bank and Gaza trip. For more news and videos visit ☛ http://english.ntdtv.com Follow us on Twitter ☛ http://twitter.com/NTDTelevision Add us on Facebook ☛ http://on.fb.me/s5KV2C
Views: 63855 NTDTV
Jon Jackson, the Blood Samples from the Shroud
 
06:51
4th and final segment The Hungary Prayer Manuscript of 1192 illustrates what can only be the Shroud of Turin, predating the earliest possible date of manufacture calculated by the AMS Carbon 14 testing. All of what I have explained above can be found in the voluminous scientific and popular literature on the shroud of Turin. At this point, I would like to offer a different paradigm for assessing the accuracy of the 14th century date and the resulting claim that the shroud is the work of a 14th century forger. Again, this article is not addressing the issue of whether or not the Shroud of Turin was the burial cloth of Jesus of Nazareth and its value as a "relic" of Christianity. It addresses only whether the shroud is a genuine archaeological artifact of a 1st century crucifixion. This paradigm assumes that the radiocarbonists' claim that the Shroud of Turin is a 14th century forgery is correct. It is based on what that conclusion tells us about the forger. It tells us that: 1. The forger first painted the bloodstains before he painted the image. 2. The forger integrated forensic qualities to his image that would only be known 20th century science. 3. The forger duplicated blood flow patterns in perfect forensic agreement to blood flow from the wrists at 65° from vertical to suggest the exact crucifixion position of the arms. 4. The forger "painted" the blood flows with genuine group AB blood that he had "spiked" with excessive amounts of bilirubin since the forger knew that severe concussive scourging with a Roman flagrum would cause erythrocyte hemolysis and jaundice. 5. The forger "plotted" the scourge marks on the body of the "man in the shroud" to be consistent under forensic examination with two scourgers of varying height. 6. The forger also duplicated abrasion and compression marks on the scourge wounds of the shoulders to suggest to 20th century forensic examiners that the "man in the shroud" had carried a heavy weight following the scourging. 7. The forger, against all convention of medieval artistry, painted the body he was "hoaxing" as Jesus of Nazareth, nude to conform to genuine Roman crucifixions. 8. The forger, as the forensic genius he was, illustrated the nails of crucifixion accurately through the wrists rather than the hands as in all other conventional medieval representations. He also took into account that the thumbs of a crucified victim would rotate inward as a result of median nerve damage as the nails passed through the spaces of Destot. 9. The forger was clever enough to "salt" the linen with the pollens of plants indigenous only to the environs of Jerusalem in anticipation of 20th century palynological analysis. 10. The forger was an artist who surpassed the talents of all known artists to the present day, being able to "paint" an anatomically and photographically perfect human image in a photographic negative manner, centuries before photography, and be able to do so without being able to check his work, close up, as he progressed. 11. The forger was able to paint this image with some unknown medium using an unknown technique, 30-40 feet away in order to discern the shadowy image as he continued. 12. The forger was clever enough to depict an adult with an unplaited pony-tail, sidelocks and a beard style consistent with a Jewish male of the 1st century. 13. The forger thought of such minute details as incorporating dirt from the bare feet of the "man in the shroud" consistent with the calcium carbonate soil of the environs of Jerusalem. 14. This forger was such an expert in 20th century biochemistry, medicine, forensic pathology and anatomy, botany, photography and 3-D computer analysis that he has foiled all the efforts of modern science. His unknown and historically unduplicated artistic technique surpasses all great historical artists, making the pale efforts of DaVinci, Michaelangelo, Raphael and Botticelli appear as infantile scribblings. If the Shroud of Turin is a forgery of the 14th century, as the radiocarbonists claim, and not a genuine artifact of the 1st century, all of these qualities of the purported medieval "forger" must be accepted. If the Shroud was "forged" it would have to have been painted. It is an irrefutable fact that there is NO paint or pigment on the Shroud of Turin leaving the only explanation of the technique of the forger to have used "photography" to manufacture the relic in the THIRTEENTH CENTURY!! Some authors have gone so far as to suggest exactly that. This is patently absurd! CONCLUSION The Shroud of Turin is a genuine artifact of a first century Roman crucifixion of an adult Jewish male. The radiocarbon dating placing the manufacture of the linen in the 14th century was flawed by extrinsic C14 accumulated over centuries of fungal growth, candle smoke and the intense heat of the fire of 1532. There is NO paint on the linen of the shroud and is not the artifice of a forger.
Views: 8149 Dr0pDuckC0ver
''THE FOSSIL RECORD'' presented by Dr.Patton Ph.D 1-7
 
10:01
Geologist Dr.Patton Ph.D quotes evolution scientists who discuss the critical nature of the age of earth to the evolution theory. Experts in the fields of radiometric, radiocarbon and the geologic record dating discuss the assumptions and validity of such dating processes. The age of the earth is pivotal to how we view the Bible. If evolution is correct, than the divine inspiration of scripture is doubtful. Many "Christians" seem to hold the view that the account in Genesis is just a nice myth. Some feel that a "day" does not mean a 24 hour period. Dr. Patton illustrates that those who hold such views cannot believe what the bible teaches. There is no compromise between creation and evolution. Anti-Creationist, William D. Stansfield Professor of Biological Sciences at California Polytechnic State University describes evidence that supports the theory of a young earth. The fossil record in fact seems to support creation as opposed to evolution. No new phyla have appeared since the Cambrian explosion according to Stephen Gould. Significant change from species to species is not evident from the fossil record. The alternative explanation of punctuated equilibrium utilizes mechanisms that are not observed in fact such a theory may in fact support the creation model more than evolution. This first installament lays the foundation of all other discussions relating to Creation Science and Evolution. Experts agree that there are only two possibilities as to the origins of man: Evolution and Creation. While evolution is being taught in our schools, there is no mandate that forbids teachers from presenting material on creation science. Science requires all of its theories to adhere to principles of Observeability, Repeatability, and Falsifiability. Observations of bacteria mutations seem to support abrupt change rather than slow change over a long period of time. Bacteria today as compared to cells in fossils look very much alike. These cells are far from primitive cells. In fact each bacteria cell contains enough genetic information to fill 1,000 Encyclopedia Britannicas. Since bacteria (a cell that rapidly mutates) today has not changed over time, Darwin's theory is broken. Here Dr. Patton discusses the laws of thermodynamics and demonstrates that evolution seems to contradict these laws. The 2nd Law tells us that everything tends to get more disorganized whereas evolution seems to depict a system that goes from an unorganized state to a more complex, highly organized state. We observe in nature that all processes are deteriorating. There must be a beginning state, a state from which all things begin to get disorganized. Evolution does not answer that observation, only creation provides any insight. Fossil "Man" including Rampithecus, Australopithecus have been shown as apes not men. Neanderthal and Cro-Magnon are men. Man is "older" than some of his ancestors, according to the 1470 skull and other fossil finds. Dating the earth using the geological column uses circular logic according to many experts. Human footprints have been found inside of dinasaur prints in Paluxy, Texas. The fossil record indicates a sudden, universal catastrophe, many contemporary geologists believe. Finally, Dr. Patton discusses alternative explanations to the evolution theory.
Views: 7478 JesusLostChildren777
Shroud of Turin (part 3)
 
07:16
Forensic and other scientific analyses produced evidence that the figure in the Shroud was that of a badly bruised man who was eventually crucified. However, carbon-dating in the early 80's showed that the cloth dates back to the Medieval Ages.This video is from the official website of the Philippine exhibit which started last July 2007 (http://www.shroudexhibits.ph/main/#).
Views: 60220 Fr. Raul Asuncion
God's 3-D photograph and X-ray of the Resurrection
 
04:42
The Hungary Prayer Manuscript of 1192 illustrates what can only be the Shroud of Turin, predating the earliest possible date of manufacture calculated by the AMS Carbon 14 testing. All of what I have explained above can be found in the voluminous scientific and popular literature on the shroud of Turin. At this point, I would like to offer a different paradigm for assessing the accuracy of the 14th century date and the resulting claim that the shroud is the work of a 14th century forger. Again, this article is not addressing the issue of whether or not the Shroud of Turin was the burial cloth of Jesus of Nazareth and its value as a "relic" of Christianity. It addresses only whether the shroud is a genuine archaeological artifact of a 1st century crucifixion. This paradigm assumes that the radiocarbonists' claim that the Shroud of Turin is a 14th century forgery is correct. It is based on what that conclusion tells us about the forger. It tells us that: 1. The forger first painted the bloodstains before he painted the image. 2. The forger integrated forensic qualities to his image that would only be known 20th century science. 3. The forger duplicated blood flow patterns in perfect forensic agreement to blood flow from the wrists at 65° from vertical to suggest the exact crucifixion position of the arms. 4. The forger "painted" the blood flows with genuine group AB blood that he had "spiked" with excessive amounts of bilirubin since the forger knew that severe concussive scourging with a Roman flagrum would cause erythrocyte hemolysis and jaundice. 5. The forger "plotted" the scourge marks on the body of the "man in the shroud" to be consistent under forensic examination with two scourgers of varying height. 6. The forger also duplicated abrasion and compression marks on the scourge wounds of the shoulders to suggest to 20th century forensic examiners that the "man in the shroud" had carried a heavy weight following the scourging. 7. The forger, against all convention of medieval artistry, painted the body he was "hoaxing" as Jesus of Nazareth, nude to conform to genuine Roman crucifixions. 8. The forger, as the forensic genius he was, illustrated the nails of crucifixion accurately through the wrists rather than the hands as in all other conventional medieval representations. He also took into account that the thumbs of a crucified victim would rotate inward as a result of median nerve damage as the nails passed through the spaces of Destot. 9. The forger was clever enough to "salt" the linen with the pollens of plants indigenous only to the environs of Jerusalem in anticipation of 20th century palynological analysis. 10. The forger was an artist who surpassed the talents of all known artists to the present day, being able to "paint" an anatomically and photographically perfect human image in a photographic negative manner, centuries before photography, and be able to do so without being able to check his work, close up, as he progressed. 11. The forger was able to paint this image with some unknown medium using an unknown technique, 30-40 feet away in order to discern the shadowy image as he continued. 12. The forger was clever enough to depict an adult with an unplaited pony-tail, sidelocks and a beard style consistent with a Jewish male of the 1st century. 13. The forger thought of such minute details as incorporating dirt from the bare feet of the "man in the shroud" consistent with the calcium carbonate soil of the environs of Jerusalem. 14. This forger was such an expert in 20th century biochemistry, medicine, forensic pathology and anatomy, botany, photography and 3-D computer analysis that he has foiled all the efforts of modern science. His unknown and historically unduplicated artistic technique surpasses all great historical artists, making the pale efforts of DaVinci, Michaelangelo, Raphael and Botticelli appear as infantile scribblings. If the Shroud of Turin is a forgery of the 14th century, as the radiocarbonists claim, and not a genuine artifact of the 1st century, all of these qualities of the purported medieval "forger" must be accepted. If the Shroud was "forged" it would have to have been painted. It is an irrefutable fact that there is NO paint or pigment on the Shroud of Turin leaving the only explanation of the technique of the forger to have used "photography" to manufacture the relic in the THIRTEENTH CENTURY!! Some authors have gone so far as to suggest exactly that. This is patently absurd! CONCLUSION The Shroud of Turin is a genuine artifact of a first century Roman crucifixion of an adult Jewish male. The radiocarbon dating placing the manufacture of the linen in the 14th century was flawed by extrinsic C14 accumulated over centuries of fungal growth, candle smoke and the intense heat of the fire of 1532. There is NO paint on the linen of the shroud and is not the artifice of a forger.
Views: 7727 Dr0pDuckC0ver
Creationist quote mine collapse
 
08:02
Creationist quote mine collapse. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quote_mining Credit: Atheist Experience http://www.atheist-experience.com 07/27/09 #563
Views: 385844 PiroNiro
Final Proof Of Evolution Falsified
 
05:30
http://www.evolutionforum.info Check this out! Very interesting forum. http://evolutionsciencenow.blogspot.com/ Debunking radiometric dating destroys the idea of fossils as evidence. It is nothing more than a funny cult of fools who like this idea and nothing more. Copyright Havenmade Inc. 2008-2009 All rights reserved. You may may not make any copies of this video for redistribution. YOU MAY PLACE A DIRECT LINK TO THIS VIDEO BY EMBEDDING IT, BUT NEVER CAN YOU DOWN LOAD FOR REDISTRIBUTION. Well this is the wind that blows the house of cards down around the whole evolution hoax. If you still believe after this then you are really lost. This video, clearly shows you that fossil dating is not possible. There is no way to date fossils accurately at all, not even from 1000 years to 10,000years they could all be the same age. The evodelusionists have no clue what the conditions on earth were or where the materials came from or what has effected their conditions. They make assumptions that make asses out of themselves. Creation Vs Evolution Creationism Theories Creation Vs. Evolution Debate Creationism V.s. Evolution Evidence of Creationism Creationism Evolution Arguments Human Evolution Proof of Creation Facts on Creationism Evolution Versus Creationism Evolution of Man Creation Vs Evolution Evolution Evidence Human Evolution Timeline X-men Evolution Human Evolution Chart Natural Selection darwin darwin awards darwins theory of evolution darwinism darwins theory darwins theory of natural selection darwin theory evolution darwin theory of evolution darwin theory darwins finches Religion Vs. Evolution Evolution of Man Science Vs Religion Evolution Human Evolution Religious Theories of Evolution Theistic Evolution Christian Religion Evolution Satan's Evolution Greek Religion Evolution Define Evolution Biography of Richard Dawkins Dawkins Evolution Biologist Richard Dawkins Richard Dawkins on Life after Death Richard Dawkins the Selfish Gene Richard Dawkins Quotes, Richard Dawkins What Is Richard Dawkins Known for? Richard Dawkins Memes Richard Dawkins the Blind Watchmaker Atheism And Beliefs Atheism Religion Kenneth Miller Finding Darwin's God Evolution Versus Christianity God Evolution Pope Evolution Evolution Versus Creation Theory Evolution Debates Human Evolution Evolution of Man Creation Vs Evolution Evolution Evidence Creationism Vs.evolution Creationism Theories Creationism Evolution Arguments Creationism Vs. Evolutionism Evolution Versus Creationism Definition of Creationism Scientific Creationism Evolution Creationism Schools Should Creationism Be Taught in Public Schools Article on Evolution And Creationism intelligent design intelligent design theory intelligent design theory of the universe intelligent design vs darwin theory intelligent design be taught in school intelligent design evolution intelligent design in public schools intelligent design vs. evolution intelligent design in schools intelligent design pros and cons Definition of Intelligent Design Intelligent Design Vs Darwin Theory Evidence for Intelligent Design Intelligent Design Theory of the Universe Intelligent Design Be Taught in School Creationism And Intelligent Design Summary of Intelligent Design What Does the Theory of Intelligent Design Say??
Views: 19348 GoodScienceForYou
The Burial Cloth of Jesus
 
10:53
The Hungary Prayer Manuscript of 1192 illustrates what can only be the Shroud of Turin, predating the earliest possible date of manufacture calculated by the AMS Carbon 14 testing. This paradigm assumes that the radiocarbonists' claim that the Shroud of Turin is a 14th century forgery is correct. It is based on what that conclusion tells us about the forger. It tells us hypothetically that: 1. The forger first painted the bloodstains before he painted the image. 2. The forger integrated forensic qualities to his image that would only be known 20th century science. 3. The forger duplicated blood flow patterns in perfect forensic agreement to blood flow from the wrists at 65° from vertical to suggest the exact crucifixion position of the arms. 4. The forger "painted" the blood flows with genuine group AB blood that he had "spiked" with excessive amounts of bilirubin since the forger knew that severe concussive scourging with a Roman flagrum would cause erythrocyte hemolysis and jaundice. 5. The forger "plotted" the scourge marks on the body of the "man in the shroud" to be consistent under forensic examination with two scourgers of varying height. 6. The forger also duplicated abrasion and compression marks on the scourge wounds of the shoulders to suggest to 20th century forensic examiners that the "man in the shroud" had carried a heavy weight following the scourging. 7. The forger, against all convention of medieval artistry, painted the body he was "hoaxing" as Jesus of Nazareth, nude to conform to genuine Roman crucifixions. 8. The forger, as the forensic genius he was, illustrated the nails of crucifixion accurately through the wrists rather than the hands as in all other conventional medieval representations. He also took into account that the thumbs of a crucified victim would rotate inward as a result of median nerve damage as the nails passed through the spaces of Destot. 9. The forger was clever enough to "salt" the linen with the pollens of plants indigenous only to the environs of Jerusalem in anticipation of 20th century palynological analysis. 10. The forger was an artist who surpassed the talents of all known artists to the present day, being able to "paint" an anatomically and photographically perfect human image in a photographic negative manner, centuries before photography, and be able to do so without being able to check his work, close up, as he progressed. 11. The forger was able to paint this image with some unknown medium using an unknown technique, 30-40 feet away in order to discern the shadowy image as he continued. 12. The forger was clever enough to depict an adult with an unplaited pony-tail, sidelocks and a beard style consistent with a Jewish male of the 1st century. 13. The forger thought of such minute details as incorporating dirt from the bare feet of the "man in the shroud" consistent with the calcium carbonate soil of the environs of Jerusalem. 14. This forger was such an expert in 20th century biochemistry, medicine, forensic pathology and anatomy, botany, photography and 3-D computer analysis that he has foiled all the efforts of modern science. His unknown and historically unduplicated artistic technique surpasses all great historical artists, making the pale efforts of DaVinci, Michaelangelo, Raphael and Botticelli appear as infantile scribblings. If the Shroud of Turin is a forgery of the 14th century, as the radiocarbonists claim, and not a genuine artifact of the 1st century, all of these qualities of the purported medieval "forger" must be accepted. If the Shroud was "forged" it would have to have been painted. It is an irrefutable fact that there is NO paint or pigment on the Shroud of Turin leaving the only explanation of the technique of the forger to have used "photography" to manufacture the relic in the THIRTEENTH CENTURY!! Some authors have gone so far as to suggest exactly that. This is patently absurd! CONCLUSION The Shroud of Turin is a genuine artifact of a first century Roman crucifixion of an adult Jewish male. The radiocarbon dating placing the manufacture of the linen in the 14th century was flawed by extrinsic C14 accumulated over centuries of fungal growth, candle smoke and the intense heat of the fire of 1532. There is NO paint on the linen of the shroud and is not the artifice of a forger.
Views: 19105 Dr0pDuckC0ver
How to Play Paintball : All About Paintball Accessories
 
02:25
Learn from an expert about paintball accessories and what accessories and gear are used in paintball in this free instructional video on paintballing. Expert: Dan Foss Contact: www.arizonapaintballadventures.com Bio: Dan Foss is the owner of Paintball Adventures in Cottonwood az. Call Paintball Adventures to book a paintball party in the Sedona Arizona area. Filmmaker: Chuck Tyler
Views: 51356 expertvillage
Dr Alan Whanger's Technique -- Possible Image Formation
 
01:56
Dr Alan Whanger's dual image polarization overlays that are projected on screen as one image to detect X-ray like skull features on the face of the man on the shroud. If one assumes that the radiocarbonists' claim that the Shroud of Turin is a 14th century forgery is correct. It is based on what that conclusion tells us about the forger. It tells us that: 1. The forger first painted the bloodstains before he painted the image. 2. The forger integrated forensic qualities to his image that would only be known 20th century science. 3. The forger duplicated blood flow patterns in perfect forensic agreement to blood flow from the wrists at 65° from vertical to suggest the exact crucifixion position of the arms. 4. The forger "painted" the blood flows with genuine group AB blood that he had "spiked" with excessive amounts of bilirubin since the forger knew that severe concussive scourging with a Roman flagrum would cause erythrocyte hemolysis and jaundice. 5. The forger "plotted" the scourge marks on the body of the "man in the shroud" to be consistent under forensic examination with two scourgers of varying height. 6. The forger also duplicated abrasion and compression marks on the scourge wounds of the shoulders to suggest to 20th century forensic examiners that the "man in the shroud" had carried a heavy weight following the scourging. 7. The forger, against all convention of medieval artistry, painted the body he was "hoaxing" as Jesus of Nazareth, nude to conform to genuine Roman crucifixions. 8. The forger, as the forensic genius he was, illustrated the nails of crucifixion accurately through the wrists rather than the hands as in all other conventional medieval representations. He also took into account that the thumbs of a crucified victim would rotate inward as a result of median nerve damage as the nails passed through the spaces of Destot. 9. The forger was clever enough to "salt" the linen with the pollens of plants indigenous only to the environs of Jerusalem in anticipation of 20th century palynological analysis. 10. The forger was an artist who surpassed the talents of all known artists to the present day, being able to "paint" an anatomically and photographically perfect human image in a photographic negative manner, centuries before photography, and be able to do so without being able to check his work, close up, as he progressed. 11. The forger was able to paint this image with some unknown medium using an unknown technique, 30-40 feet away in order to discern the shadowy image as he continued. 12. The forger was clever enough to depict an adult with an unplaited pony-tail, sidelocks and a beard style consistent with a Jewish male of the 1st century. 13. The forger thought of such minute details as incorporating dirt from the bare feet of the "man in the shroud" consistent with the calcium carbonate soil of the environs of Jerusalem. 14. This forger was such an expert in 20th century biochemistry, medicine, forensic pathology and anatomy, botany, photography and 3-D computer analysis that he has foiled all the efforts of modern science. His unknown and historically unduplicated artistic technique surpasses all great historical artists, making the pale efforts of DaVinci, Michaelangelo, Raphael and Botticelli appear as infantile scribblings. If the Shroud of Turin is a forgery of the 14th century, as the radiocarbonists claim, and not a genuine artifact of the 1st century, all of these qualities of the purported medieval "forger" must be accepted. If the Shroud was "forged" it would have to have been painted. It is an irrefutable fact that there is NO paint or pigment on the Shroud of Turin leaving the only explanation of the technique of the forger to have used "photography" to manufacture the relic in the THIRTEENTH CENTURY!! Some authors have gone so far as to suggest exactly that. This is patently absurd! CONCLUSION The Shroud of Turin is a genuine artifact of a first century Roman crucifixion of an adult Jewish male. The radiocarbon dating placing the manufacture of the linen in the 14th century was flawed by extrinsic C14 accumulated over centuries of fungal growth, candle smoke and the intense heat of the fire of 1532. There is NO paint on the linen of the shroud and is not the artifice of a forger.
Views: 3385 Dr0pDuckC0ver
New Documentary about the Shroud of Turin
 
05:48
There are very few Christian relics as important and as controversial as the Shroud of Turin.This linen cloth, measuring about 4.4m by 1.1m (14.4x3.6 feet) holds the concealed image of a man bearing all the signs of crucifixion.Scientific tests have proved that there are blood stains around the marks consistent with a crown of thorns and a puncture from a lance to the side.In a new documentary, we have been given intimate access that no other broadcaster has had before. Until the 1980s, millions of Christians around the world believed the Shroud to be the burial cloth of Christ. Put simply, it meant that for millions of people the Shroud was, in effect, a Polaroid of Jesus' death - a snapshot of the defining moment in Christianity. It put the Shroud in a league of its own in the realm of the most important Christian relics. But in 1989, the significance of the Shroud seemed to evaporate after a radiocarbon dating test pronounced a stunning verdict - the Shroud of Turin was indisputably a medieval fake. With that judgement the extraordinary story of the Shroud of Turin fell out of the public imagination. After all, how could any other kind of evidence about the shroud compare to the verdict of science? But the amazing story of the Shroud of Turin has simply refused to fade into obscurity and die, for the simple reason that a conflict of evidence has emerged which is about the re-ignite the debate around this compelling religious artefact.If it is a medieval forgery, then how was this image made? This documentary try to answer this and other questions.
Tanks - Low Pressure vs High Pressure Output Tanks
 
05:31
http://www.markerbids.com : Check out Mike's new auction website! http://www.facebook.com/techpb : Go like our Facebook page! http://www.techpb.com/ : Go check out our HUGE forum! QUESTION: How do you know which tank to get, high pressure or low pressure- Do you own an Angel? Yes? Get a low pressure tank No? Get a high pressure tank EVERY SINGLE PAINTBALL GUN USES HUGH PRESSURE 850psi Output, every single one except the angel. Ok, this show I talk about the difference between a low pressure tank, and a high pressure output tank. Low Pressure= 4500psi in the tank, regulator outputs at 450psi High Pressure = 4500psi in the tank, regulator outputs at 850psi Every single paintball gun designed today is designed to work on HIGH PRESSURE TANKS. There is only 1 gun designed to work on LOW pressure, thats a 2005 Angel. If your gun is NOT a 2005 Angel, go with a high pressure tank. The high pressure tanks recharge faster, they have better resale, and they work on EVERYTHING. If you want a low pressure tank, it's your gun. You will not a notice a difference, except when you go to sell it. When it doubt, go high pressure. Think of your regulator as a water bucket, do you want to fill it at 450 drops per minute, or 850 drops per minute? High pressure regulators are the best way to go. Low pressure regulators being "easier on regs" is a myth, what is it easier on? the orings? no, the spring? the spring stack? The metal? Negative ghost rider go high pressure, and play paintball! Enjoy!!
Views: 119989 Mike Phillips
Complexity (Chapter 1 of 6)
 
09:14
Just three particles and the forces that cause them to interact give rise to all of the incredible and wonderful complexity that makes this universe such an interesting place.
Views: 43060 cassiopeiaproject
Star Trek's Captain Kirk's Guide To Women- LIVE!!
 
03:35
http://www.CaptainKirksGuideToWomen.com Star Trek's Captain Kirk teaches YOU how to romance any woman in the galaxy. Funny lecture by Bones Rodriguez dating romance william shatner star trek captain kirk pick up girls pick up women online dating dating sites dating services free online dating free dating dating websites free dating sites internet dating single dating online dating service on line dating dating site dating service lesbian dating dating agency free dating service speed dating senior dating dating website black dating singles dating uk dating christian dating dating tips my chemical romance austin dating dallas dating seattle dating sci fi san diego dating san francisco dating la dating miami dating los angeles dating new york dating online dating sites online dating services dating advice gay dating pure romance romance novels alternative dating teen dating sci fi channel hamilton dating dating internet service local dating dating personals star trek movie free dating services my chemical romance lyrics how to pick up women science fiction jewish dating gay dating services star trek legacy true romance dating sim romance books dating women iowa dating matchbook romance online dating site dating games asian dating dating game star trek next generation marchen awakens romance photo dating free dating site star trek the next generation star trek tng dating sims star trek online star trek xi romance of the three kingdoms carbon dating my chemical romance teenagers romance novel sci fi movies dating chat how to pick up girls masters of science fiction romance movies mature dating romance stories star trek armada herpes dating new star trek star trek convention star trek new voyages zac efron dating find romance new star trek movie matchbook romance lyrics mobile dating dating violence internet dating services the dating game romance languages william shatner bio online romance dating in south africa to pick up girls dating web site star trek wiki star trek 11 william shatner biography harlequin romance star trek movies william shatner music phone dating william shatner song science fiction books romanian dating fish dating dating com dating south africa science fiction movies william shatner album william shatner lyrics personals romance chat love and romance enterprise singles dating girls how to pick up beautiful women due date love romance save the date due date calculator date calculator date ideas up to date how to pick up older women pick up lines for women star trek voyager first date voyager todays date canada dating dating agencies matchmaking matchmaker personal ads single women date single picking up women home based business spiritual how to make money relationship men casual easy money dateing woman making money online love friend women earn money friends iowa singles free photo ads dates find a date social networking singles sites soulmate adult flirt couples meet people introductions meet single men find love flirting match austin singles matchmakers attract women party like a rock star find singles meet women chat dancing with the stars friendship famous stars and straps
Views: 7943 Bones Rodriguez
Humvee Climbing Vertical Wall 1
 
00:44
Watch the Hummer Ohio Extreme Squad climb a 6 ft vertical wall . . . brought to you by BlackHumvee.com
Views: 12362458 TonyAnzovino
Kent Hovind, Jared, Winning Arguments etc., 06/05, Part  4.
 
10:00
Winning Arguments, GULO, Nature of Historical Science, Bible Contradictions, Noah's Flood, Out of Place Fossils. Conducted June 17th, 2005.
Views: 408 freethoughtEFNet
2008 BUSAN World TreX-Games
 
04:12
The 4th Busan TAFISA World Sport for All Games will be held in the Busan from September 26 through October 2, 2008. It is the "World Sports Cultural Festival" to be participated by approximately 10,000 participants from over 100 nations. Significantly, for the first time the 4th Busan TAFISA Wolrd Sport for All Games are officially patronized by IOC. The Busan Games have adopted New Sports(e-sports and X-sports) which will be enable it to be the world's largest sports and culture event integrating the tradition and future sports beyond the barriers of age and generation and World 10 Million Walking Day will be held along with other sport events.
Views: 13385 TreXGames2008
Global Climate Summit: Witnessing the World Response Film
 
07:34
National Geographic film on the effects of climate change at the 2008 Global Climate Summit. Series: "Governors' Global Climate Summit" [Science] [Show ID: 15717]
Michael Shermer vs Kent Hovind (Whale Fossils)
 
10:01
In this debate clip, Hovind and Shermer debate on the topic of vetigial structures, whale evolution, some fossils like ambolocitus. See Who wins!
Views: 9685 Josh Davidian
Onboard the 2008 Suzuki GSX-R600
 
02:03
MCN Man Adam Child is in MIsano hoping to test the 2008 GSX-R600 but fog has delayed that start of the test so we thought we'd bring you some onboard footage of the bike recorded earlier. Love this video? Don’t forget to subscribe to our channel: http://bit.ly/2dMl0sx Get the best of biking EVERY day... Stay up to date with the latest from MCN: Latest motorcycle news: http://www.motorcyclenews.com/ Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/MotorcycleNews/ Follow @MCNnews on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/MCNNews Follow @MCNsport on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/MCNSport Welcome to the official YouTube channel of the world’s biggest print and online motorcycle publication. All the greatest motorcycle video content from the world’s most respected motorcycling media brand. Since 1955 MCN is available weekly in both print and digital editions and 24/7 on motorcyclenews.com
Views: 144610 MCN - Motorcyclenews.com
Jon Jackson overview of the Shroud of Jesus
 
05:57
Harold Cohen interviews Jon Jackson he Hungary Prayer Manuscript of 1192 illustrates what can only be the Shroud of Turin, predating the earliest possible date of manufacture calculated by the AMS Carbon 14 testing. All of what I have explained above can be found in the voluminous scientific and popular literature on the shroud of Turin. At this point, I would like to offer a different paradigm for assessing the accuracy of the 14th century date and the resulting claim that the shroud is the work of a 14th century forger. Again, this article is not addressing the issue of whether or not the Shroud of Turin was the burial cloth of Jesus of Nazareth and its value as a "relic" of Christianity. It addresses only whether the shroud is a genuine archaeological artifact of a 1st century crucifixion. This paradigm assumes that the radiocarbonists' claim that the Shroud of Turin is a 14th century forgery is correct. It is based on what that conclusion tells us about the forger. It tells us that: 1. The forger first painted the bloodstains before he painted the image. 2. The forger integrated forensic qualities to his image that would only be known 20th century science. 3. The forger duplicated blood flow patterns in perfect forensic agreement to blood flow from the wrists at 65° from vertical to suggest the exact crucifixion position of the arms. 4. The forger "painted" the blood flows with genuine group AB blood that he had "spiked" with excessive amounts of bilirubin since the forger knew that severe concussive scourging with a Roman flagrum would cause erythrocyte hemolysis and jaundice. 5. The forger "plotted" the scourge marks on the body of the "man in the shroud" to be consistent under forensic examination with two scourgers of varying height. 6. The forger also duplicated abrasion and compression marks on the scourge wounds of the shoulders to suggest to 20th century forensic examiners that the "man in the shroud" had carried a heavy weight following the scourging. 7. The forger, against all convention of medieval artistry, painted the body he was "hoaxing" as Jesus of Nazareth, nude to conform to genuine Roman crucifixions. 8. The forger, as the forensic genius he was, illustrated the nails of crucifixion accurately through the wrists rather than the hands as in all other conventional medieval representations. He also took into account that the thumbs of a crucified victim would rotate inward as a result of median nerve damage as the nails passed through the spaces of Destot. 9. The forger was clever enough to "salt" the linen with the pollens of plants indigenous only to the environs of Jerusalem in anticipation of 20th century palynological analysis. 10. The forger was an artist who surpassed the talents of all known artists to the present day, being able to "paint" an anatomically and photographically perfect human image in a photographic negative manner, centuries before photography, and be able to do so without being able to check his work, close up, as he progressed. 11. The forger was able to paint this image with some unknown medium using an unknown technique, 30-40 feet away in order to discern the shadowy image as he continued. 12. The forger was clever enough to depict an adult with an unplaited pony-tail, sidelocks and a beard style consistent with a Jewish male of the 1st century. 13. The forger thought of such minute details as incorporating dirt from the bare feet of the "man in the shroud" consistent with the calcium carbonate soil of the environs of Jerusalem. 14. This forger was such an expert in 20th century biochemistry, medicine, forensic pathology and anatomy, botany, photography and 3-D computer analysis that he has foiled all the efforts of modern science. His unknown and historically unduplicated artistic technique surpasses all great historical artists, making the pale efforts of DaVinci, Michaelangelo, Raphael and Botticelli appear as infantile scribblings. If the Shroud of Turin is a forgery of the 14th century, as the radiocarbonists claim, and not a genuine artifact of the 1st century, all of these qualities of the purported medieval "forger" must be accepted. If the Shroud was "forged" it would have to have been painted. It is an irrefutable fact that there is NO paint or pigment on the Shroud of Turin leaving the only explanation of the technique of the forger to have used "photography" to manufacture the relic in the THIRTEENTH CENTURY!! Some authors have gone so far as to suggest exactly that. This is patently absurd! CONCLUSION The Shroud of Turin is a genuine artifact of a first century Roman crucifixion of an adult Jewish male. The radiocarbon dating placing the manufacture of the linen in the 14th century was flawed by extrinsic C14 accumulated over centuries of fungal growth, candle smoke and the intense heat of the fire of 1532. There is NO paint on the linen of the shroud and is not the artifice of a forger.
Views: 2317 Dr0pDuckC0ver
Eve To Now (part 2)
 
01:36
Take a trip back in time and meet the "Mother of all mankind" the common ancestor from whom we all descend! (part 2 of 2)
Views: 5816 cassiopeiaproject
Code For Life (Chapter 1 of 6)
 
09:04
Beginning more than three and a half billion years ago, a tiny, primitive molecule encoded instructions, deep within itself, that it passed to its children, who passed it to their children and so on -- all the way down through time to all living things today.
Views: 6213 cassiopeiaproject
Dire Straits - Money For Nothing (Live At Knebworth)
 
06:47
For more info - http://www.eagle-rock.com/artist/various-artists-live-at-knebworth-1990/#.U-jpRjhwaB8 Knebworth, Hertfordshire, Saturday, June 30th, 1990. http://smarturl.it/Knebworth1990dvd http://store.eagle-rock.com/title/live-at-knebworth-1990-parts-i-ii-and-iii/ Your favourite Dire Straits albums are now on sale on Amazon: http://po.st/HLHFrX In aid of the Nordoff-Robbins Music Therapy Centre for providing music therapy for handicapped children and the BRIT school for performing arts and technology, 120,000 fans gather for a historic event featuring a legendary lineup of British rock artists... To order this DVD from Amazon if you are in the UK, please click here: http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B00006JYKT/?tag=wwweaglerockc-21 To order this DVD from amazon if you are in the US, please click here: http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00006LPCX/?tag=eaglrockente-20 Now look at them yo-yo's that's the way you do it You play the guitar on the MTV That ain't workin' that's the way you do it Money for nothin' and chicks for free Now that ain't workin' that's the way you do it Lemme tell ya them guys ain't dumb Maybe get a blister on your little finger Maybe get a blister on your thumb We gotta install microwave ovens Custom kitchen deliveries We gotta move these refrigerators We gotta move these colour TV's See the little faggot with the earring and the makeup Yeah buddy that's his own hair That little faggot got his own jet airplane That little faggot he's a millionaire We gotta install microwave ovesns Custom kitchens deliveries We gotta move these refrigerators We gotta move these colour TV's I shoulda learned to play the guitar I shoulda learned to play them drums Look at that mama, she got it stickin' in the camera Man we could have some fun And he's up there, what's that? Hawaiian noises? Bangin' on the bongoes like a chimpanzee That ain't workin' that's the way you do it Get your money for nothin' get your chicks for free We gotta install microwave ovens Custom kitchen deliveries We gotta move these refrigerators We gotta move these colour TV's, Lord Now that ain't workin' that's the way you do it You play the guitar on the MTV That ain't workin' that's the way you do it Money for nothin' and your chicks for free Money for nothin' and chicks for free
Views: 33309117 Eagle Rock
Burnout Paradise - Where Souls Collide (6 of 8)
 
00:39
Revolutionizing the online dating scene burnout.ea.com
Views: 3403 Electronic Arts

dating fails reddit
online dating cliches to avoid
dating ariane 2.0
methods of dating ancient fossils
dating aynsley china