Come visit our Dinosaur Adventure Land in Lenox, AL. Now Open since April 21, 2018!
Don't forget to check out our website: https://www.drdino.com
Please visit our Prayer Request page here https://drdino.com/prayer-requests/
Follow Dr. Hovind on Social Media:
Purchase Books, DVD's and Media:
Phone: (855) BIG-DINO (244-3466)
Schedule an event or Seminars:
To donate to CSE ministry, please visit our website at http://www.drdino.com/donate or email Ernie Land at [email protected]
Join our 777 Club for a dollar a day, $31 a month. Help us keep Dinosaur Adventure Land Free by becoming a partner today! We have a creation museum, rides, 10 lakes, fishing, hands on science lessons, and much more!
If you want to see if a question on Bible/Creation/Evolution etc. that has already been answered in a previous video, just go to the search box and type in "Kent Hovind Official" and the particular subject/topic. Thanks!
Please get involved and tell others about this Creation Science Evangelism and our YouTube Channel to strengthen their faith in Jesus Christ as we study science and the Bible with Dr. Kent Hovind.
We provide this channel and information totally free of charge for the purposes stated above. If you feel led by the Lord to help support this ministry we do accept donations to "Creation Science Evangelism (CSE), Inc." on our website via PayPal.
If you would like to help give King James Bibles to inmates in prison, you can do so by donating here:
To Learn about Pastor Kent Hovind's unjust 9-year imprisonment as a political target go to:
To contact Dr. Hovind Directly call (855) 244-3466 x3
To reach our IT and Production department for questions about Videos, YouTube, social media or the website please call (855) 244-3466 x5 or send email to: Steve at [email protected]
It was this day in 2017 that I was making the hardest decision, do I stay with Kent? I was in SC attending my daughter's wedding on 7-7-17, thinking of my own wedding that took place 9 months earlier...
This is irrelevant. Someone presented unverified opinion that went against EVERY OTHER PIECE OF EVIDENCE and it was removed as a result.This has nothing to do with ‘ignoring contrary evidence/ as it is not evidence. These are the irrational views of conspiracists. Sorry, not convinced.
Sir Isaac Newton, 1642 – 1747
About the times of the End, a body of men will be raised up who will turn their attention to the prophecies, and insist upon their literal interpretation, in the midst of much clamor and opposition.”
― Isaac Newton
Now we should not discount the fact that the concentration of C14 in the atmosphere takes about 30,000 years to reach equilibrium ..ergo what goes in to it equals what goes out of it. But recent studies show that atmospheric C14 conentrations are still increasing. No where near equilibrium and the study indicated that C14 has been accumulating for only 3,000 to 6,000 years at the most. Hence, when we carbon date something that existed at a time when atmospheric C14 concentration was less than today it would appear (via C14testing) to be much older than it actually is... A very good teacher taught me this.
Kent's purpose is to win people for Christ. He says that all the time. The proofs for a young earth are not nullified because of anything that has been presented by "scientists." All verifiable science supports that God made this world. God has been good to me and he will always be good to you too. "Come to me all you who are weary and heavy laden and I will give you rest. Take my yoke upon you and learn from me for I am gentle and humble of heart and you will find rest for your souls, for my yoke is easy and my burden is light." That is what Jesus says to you. Give him a chance to show you.
Hi Kent, if these so call clever, highly educated Scientist, say that dinosaurs lived millions and millions of years before man; why do we have stone carvings of dragons/dinosaurs from all over the world that are a few 1000 years old, that would not be possible unless they had seen these creatures. To my mind that makes these scientists, liars, and they are educated to the level of stupid and foolish.God bless and keep bursting their bubbles.
There is lots of evidence, The Ica stones from Peru, Cambodian temple 10th centre, if you can't see a Stegosaurus you should have gone to Specsavers. A series of 14 human footprints with at least 134 dinosaur tracks in the bedrock of the Paluxy River, near Glen Rose, Texas. Just a few reference's and its clearly more evidence that man lived with dinosaurs, rather than the no evidence of them being millions of years apart.
1. You would need actual evidence to show that these carvings really depict dinosaurs.
2. In the case that they would depict dinosaurs, you would need to rule out any other explanation.
I thought the soaking in acid was to remove possible contaminants. Soaking in acid does not remove minerals or unpetrify. It was not petrified/mineralized the way one would expect if it were millions of years old. She said that if you cut it open, it looked just like a modern-day bone, " airy and light," not hard and solid like a rock since it was not petrified . There are videos of the flexible tissue that she found. The video shows tweezers picking up and stretching the tissue and putting it back because it still flexible. That is not millions of years old.
REQUEST.......................Kent...While I'm sure you don't oppose opposition or go out of your way to avoid it, but those folks who get so vulgar in their posts...could you PLEASE either delete their posts, or ban them or at least lay down some ground rules for your channel? We all get enough of the garbage and vulgarity from other channels, but would hope from a Christian channel there could be somewhat of a haven from the filth.
I think I am a backdoor Christian. I got injured in '92. Since then I have had a lot of time to "investigate" my world via the unfiltered internet. After a lot of reading and watching I discovered almost everything I was taught is a LIE. For example: Why do they not teach fractional reserve banking in High Schools? War is a Racket - Gen. Smedley Butler. Government is not "for the people". Everything is upside down. The Patriot Act is unconstitutional. DFACS hurts kids. etc.. I have a standard statement that encapsulates my "research":
This world is ruled by Satanic Pedophiles and has been for centuries. They have an understanding of the human mind that borders on the supernatural. They abuse/exploit humanity with impunity. No one seems to notice. No one seems to care.
I discovered the Devil is real before I would accept that God was. Is the Devil a Demon, Fallen Angel, time traveling multi-dimensional alien race or a pre-flood Terran race? I do not know. I just know he/they have been in charge for a very very long time and I don't like'em. Once this discovery became my truth. Then God must also be real and if I must choose a side. I choose God.
Everything I looked into would circle around and end up back at the Bible. In my mind there was no way any book could have be written, translated, edited over the course of 2K years and still be remotely accurate. I now know I was wrong. There is truth in the Bible.
This was hard pill for me to swallow. My Wife is the only person that have ever bent my knee for. I had unknowingly installed a God Block in my mind. It is a process removing the 45 yr old God firewall. I think this firewall was installed after discovering the hypocrisy of religions and not the Word itself. I just wanted to thank you for helping me understand the Word and the practice of faith.
I want to fight this Satanic NWO. Like you I have grandkids and I want them to live free and happy.
Thank you for your service, Sir.
Why is religious people against the work that there fellow Humans do, I've just completed my four year college course on Anthropology & can't think why any Human being wouldn't want to learn & if your smart enough really understand our origins. As the only intelligent species on our planet its our duty to work out how Nature & the universe works, One thing Adult Humans should know for a fact in the 21st century is that there is NO such thing as a magic man with unbelievable magic powers, I will say this till the day i die, ADULTS who believe in a magic man in the 21st century is shockingly embarrassing. Superstitious thoughts came before intelligence (FACT).
Steven, science is fun and Creationists are never against it. I really don't understand why the religion of evolution has to build straw men and beat them down. We love science I would never want someone to not take a science course. In my opinion, you will never need evolution to obtain higher learning in any degree offered unless you are an evolution preacher. We as creationist only disagree on starting conditions, most evolutionist have a bias to billions of years in order to give them time to create life. I just urge those who are teetering on their belief in God to not automatically jump to evolutionary beliefs just because it is jammed down your throat in public schools. I got my engineering degree without an ounce of evolutionary science used! In real life you will find no use for cosmic evolution, chemical evolution, abiogenesis evolution, and macro-evolution. Natural selection we agree upon and is used in daily lives. If you are force fed the false basis's of evolution and your mind is not already made up, please search this stuff out for yourself looking at all the evidences, including the many highly regarded Creation scientist all over the world.
Thomas, "Sir Fred Hoyle and Chandra Wickramasinghe, Evolution from Space (London: Dent, 1981), p. 148, 24." For getting the proteins aligned capable of life. “The order of the amino acids in a protein determines its function and whether indeed it will have a function at all.” Lee Spetner, Not By Chance (New York, NY: Judaica Press, 1997), p. 31" There are over 300 different types of amino acids. However, only 20 different amino acids are used in life. Each type of amino acid molecule comes in two shapes commonly referred to as left-handed and right-handed forms. Only left-handed amino acids are used in biological proteins; however, the natural tendency is for left- and right-handed amino acid molecules to bond indiscriminately. The various left-handed amino acids must bond in the correct order or the protein will not function properly. Proteins range in size from about 50 to over 30,000 amino acids. To get a small protein of 100 left-handed amino acids from an equal mixture of left- and right-handed amino acids, the probability would then be 10x30 or 1 followed by 30 zeros (1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000). This number, 10x30, only measures the possibility of getting all left-handed amino acids. It does not say anything about their order. We have a chain of 100 amino acids. Each position can be occupied by any 1 of 20 different amino acids common to living things, and these must be in a specific order to form a functional protein. What is the probability that the correct amino acid will be placed in position number 1 of the chain? It will be 1/20. What is the probability that the first two positions will be correct? This can be calculated by multiplying the two probabilities together (1/20 x 1/20 = 1/20x2). Therefore, the probability of getting all 100 amino acids in the correct position would be 1/20 multiplied by itself 100 times or 1/20x100 (this equates to 1/10x130). This is 1 followed by 130 zeros! That is just the probability of getting a single small protein by random chance. Not including the proteins in order to sustain life hence the 1 in 10X40,000 chance according to Sir Fred Hoyle and Chandra Wickramasinghe. "Emile Borel, Probabilities and Life (New York, NY: Dover, 1962), p. 28." For the probability bound!
I agree, lots of chemical reactions happen, but they must happen under certain conditions and in a very sensitive timeframe and in the right order 100% to create a simple building block to life, protien. If it were chance we could do this in a laboratory setting with accelerated results, but we haven't and I would go so far as to say you simply can't by chance alone. This requires a higher than imaginable force that we will never be able to put a number too. In the Miller experiment he left out crucial starting conditions and therefore got wrong answers. He left out oxygen, why you might ask? He knew oxygen would destroy the very molecules he was trying to create. Did the earth not contain oxygen at the beginning? If so how would they survive the harmful uv rays from the sun? Also the heat energy produced by the sun has to be harnessed by some form of transformer in-order to be useful. How was this obtained? Even if you want to say maybe no oxygen was present, every rock in which we have tested contained oxygen as far as we can dig. So there has been no proof of absence of oxygen in or on our earth. Miller wanted to make amino acids, and he got amino acids (along with sugars and a few other things). Proteins in living cells are made of just certain kinds of amino acids: those that are “alpha” (short) and “left-handed.” Miller’s “primordial soup” contained many long (beta, gamma, delta) amino acids and equal numbers of both right- and left-handed forms. Problem: Just one long or right-handed amino acid inserted into a chain of short, left-handed amino acids would prevent the coiling and folding necessary for proper protein function. What Miller actually produced was a seething brew of potent poisons that would absolutely destroy any hope for the chemical evolution of life.
westy I am pointing out a fact you don't know anything about radioactive decay. you whining doesn't help you the OP was about such dating methods again you are ignorant as we have multiple methods to find out the original amount. your projection of stupidity is funny and the "beginning material" is how much radioactive elements there were to get an accurate assessment derp. nope you are just stupid but it is fun to point and laugh at you.
I know when I say "beginning material" the response is about radioactivity and not "beginning material" which is the subject matter. So either you are trying to cover up the problem or you are stupid and can't tell the difference between radio activity and "beginning material." Perhaps both. Both are evidence of you being a propagandist.
The Ben Stein movie, Expelled is out of print, I think. Now, another movie with the same title comes up when you do the search. I saw it twice at the theater when it came out, and I still have a copy on DVD. I noticed they did some edits after the movie. Apparently he upset A LOT of people. Truth has that effect.
Thomas, If evolution was scientific fact and it had meet its burden of proof it would no longer be considered "evolution theory", and guess what....as of 5 minutes ago it was still considered just a theory!
CRSEF obtained several fragments of fossilized dinosaur bone from the paleontological collections of the Carnegie Museum of Natural History "by disguising the nature of the creationist science group" (Lafferty 1991:2B) and by misrepresenting the nature of their proposed research. James King, Director of the Carnegie Museum, says Hugh Miller and his party identified themselves as chemists who wanted to do some analyses of the chemical composition of the fossils. King says that small "bits and pieces" which had spalled off the surfaces of various specimens were offered to Miller with the explicit warning that the fossil bones had been "covered heavily in shellac" and other "unknown preservatives." Miller accepted the fragments and indicated that the coatings posed no problems for the analyses they were considering. - Bradley T. Lepper, Creation/evolution, vol 12, nr 1, 1992.
Doesn't matter what the origins of a word is. I know you religious freaks are stuck in the bronze age. What does matter is what the word refers to now. A "doctor" is someone who has attained the level of education at the doctoral level. Above an underrate and masters. It's takes years to attain this level of education and qualification. Your cult leader is not a "doctor" and does not deserve to use this title. Your cult leader is a fraud and a conman.
Here we go again, wow relentless. The term "doctor" derives from the Latin docere meaning "to teach". The doctorate (Latin: doctum, "[that which is] taught") appeared in medieval Europe as a license to teach Latin (licentia docendi) at a university. Its roots can be traced to the early church in which the term "doctor" referred to the Apostles, church fathers, and other Christian authorities who taught and interpreted the Bible I looked up hypocrisy and believe it or not theres a pic of philip, hi phil. Whats the difference between a doctorate and being indoctrinated?
Kent.. I just saw a a documentary on Netflix called "Is Genesis History?" - - It was pretty good. They interviewed several scientists to get their perspective of life and the universe. I wonder if you've seen it.
Actually no. The only joke here is you. You are paranoid and in need or serous psychological intervention. Hopefully before you go spray a play ground with n automatic weapon. Maybe a strong anti psychotic would help too.
For a start off.......This was a presentation and not a peer reviewed paper.
If someone stood up and declared that the world was pyramid shaped............ i would delete the findings.
If someone wrote a paper showing ( using science ) that the earth was indeed pyramid shaped......i would have to publish the paper in order that other scientists could review the findings.
Hovind could never publish a paper as he has NO science to back up his claims. If the current science is wrong then please show us the CORRECT science.
Does the military use religion to brainwash? No, they use a scientific method called compartmentalization. We detect this compartmentalization of evolutionists here when they make statements like there is no evidence for creation. This is a completely false statement, yet you can't see that. You don't have to believe in creation to know this statement is false. Only logical analysis.
The Bible is evidence for creation. It doesn't require you to believe the evidence for it to be evidence. So when you say that "There is absolutely no evidence to support creationism" then you are repeating a compartmentalized statement that you haven't even analyzed. And since you continue the repeat the same phrase and can't adjust your thought process for reality, then it is obvious you are brain washed.
There are many phrases that evolutionist repeat like this, so it is not a fluke. Not only do evolutionists repeat these phrases but they tend to repeat them the same way. Thus you are the one brain washed and you opinion is not your own, so can't be counted for anything.
Dr. Mary Schweitzer also discovered her T Rex bones were not decayed much either. She found blood, collagen, and tissue UNdecayed! That speaks to recent burial also. And she is not a young earth creationist, yet...
cindi lincoln She had to soak the fossil in acid for days to demineralize it. She did NOT find blood. She did experiments showing how high iron content and a near vacuum state could preserve the tissue. She has also repeatedly expressed her frustration with creationists lying about her discoveries to promote their own agenda, usually without actually having read her papers.
carbon dating is know longer accurate due to all the radioactive fallout from all the nuclear weapons that were tested. It has altered the dirt air. Every person born after 51 will have some of the chemicals(iodine 13i) from the tests in there tissues.
God Exists there testing the organic material which has been altered by the testing some of the chemicals have a half life of 24k years. So the actual content of the earth before testing began is was they base off. I read all about it thanks to Dr Hovind he made me what to know more. Also I correct my date above anyone born since 1951 has iodine 13i in them
Good for you for finally watching the video but you still didn't pay attention, there wasn't any spin.
I can tell just by reading that link (without clicking it) that you've still missed the point, If they had really thought c14 was a bad way of measuring they would have said that not 'there must have been some error' and not specified where the error was, you can't claim an error unless you know where the error is but that's very clearly what they did, they claimed an error without knowing where the error lied.
Actually, it isn't. He reads a letter and then puts his spin on it. But that's good enough for you, isn't it?
Here's an explanation why his research is bad:
C Brown, I've read most, if not all of your post on this thread. I'm with you 100% and in my opinion, evolution is just as much a religion as Christianity. It is an unproven theory that takes a leap of faith to believe after making many assumptions.
"P.S. information is not embedded in DNA any more than information is embedded in a rock layer. To put it simply DNA is simply specifically arranged chemicals. "
You need to research DNA because your statement is totally inaccurate!
Of course they did. That's what creatards do. The lie through their teeth to preserve their faith. It's a sign of fear that science is winning the fight against ignorance. Which they are.YEC is on the decline here in America. What you are witnessing here is the temper tantrum. LOL
My wife and I love all of your videos Kent!
Thank you for being like an Elijah of our day.
we home school our kids, dont vaccinate, and use your videos for our 4 children.
THANK YOU FOR BLESSING THE WORLD WITH YOUR UNDERSTANDING!
MAY GOD CONTINUE BLESSING YOU!
Scott Summers why are you worried about money lol.
oh am i out of touch with reality?
money is everything?
money is worthless...
i cant even debate you buddy cause you dont know enough...
if you think for one second u need vaccines to have a healthy immune system your mislead.
the babies immune system has no chance to develop naturally.
on top of the risks of auto immune diseases. or they could get severely handicapped and or die.
the mmr vaccine is the worst. if you ever have a baby DO NOT LET THEM VACCINATE!
the side effects are way worse than the mumps or measles!
those are not life threatening!
but the vaccines can be.
You are right. The shots are suppose activate the immune system and side affects can be harmful. But the chicken pox, measles and mumps are rarely deadly and activate the immune system with fewer side effects. When the shots cause as much or more harm then the disease then we have a problem. It is the health of the child that determines how severe or not his illnesses are.
Well if you get a c-14 date of 40k years that basically means that c-14 is probably the wrong method to use to date whatever you are dating. C-14 cannot be used for things older than 30k-40k years so if you carbon date a thing that you know is 10 million years old guess what result you get? That's right: about 40 000 years. If you throw a thermometer meant for measuring human body temperature to a vat of liquid nitrogen it still shows a result of about 35 degrees celsius because the scale won't go any lower. That doesn't mean that the nitrogen is actually 35 degrees. Also the source you cited was highly dubious. Also it claims to be about geology and not paleontology which would be the relevant branch of science when investigating dinosaur remains.
Westydowns - Nobody assumes the age of the layer. They measure it. Why would I assume layer is say 65 million year old instead of 650 million year old. Using fossils to date the layers and vice versa is only used to cross confirm the results of the dating. So if the measurement doesn't fit that you should check if there was something not quite right with your measurement which does occasionally happen. If however you keep getting contradicting results then you might want check for other explanations. Nothing circular about it and so far no data exist to support the idea that dinosaur fossils and layers that contain them are just a few thousand years old.
Exactly what I am saying. You assume the layer to be an particlular age so then assume the fossil is of that age. It is circular reasoning as God Exist said. you have already determined the age by your bias not by science.
Carbon dating has an age range of about 50,000 years so it is entirely to be expected real scientists would throw out an experiment that obviously used the wrong dating method to determine the age of dinosaur bones.
Xaxaxaxa, what a load of ;) .... "Since most dinosaur bones are older than 65 million years..." So? You say that WE KNOW that those bones (has to be) are 65 million years old, so we have to use the method that will "prove" that!? If some other method PROVES that they are NOT 65mill years old, you say "No, we have used a wrong method", so you go on and on untill you find a "method" that - FITS!!!!? And that is a point... You have to FIT those bones in the dirt to somehow fit into your religion!
Wow, I bet you went to a school that indoctrinated you with evolutionism, beacuse you've had to had some help to be that dumb! ;) .)
I MAY have the fancy $29 microphone figured out! Sorry about the previous problems. I was gone for 9 years and technology got ahead of me! :)
If all goes well I'll be home for Monday night Bible study as usual. The 1999 Motor home runs great and serves as an OK studio on the road but I'll take my own bed and office over this any day! We have retaped several parts of the creation seminar here. We should have them in production soon. Thanks for your prayers and support.
Hey Nym, did they change into something other than a fruit fly? No? Oh well, keep hoping. Your faith is strong.
Although, funny thing about those mutations, they were induced by an intelligence within a laboratory environment under non-natural conditions. Hmmmm.
as I can't seem to post links copy paste "helping hovind to understand nested hierarchies" into youtube so you can get some mild understanding.
oh and just google beneficial mutations in fruit flies and magically your claim is bunk.
jamus you are such a derp. nice projection. as you have yet to properly define you use of religion so I can properly refute it I will just call you a coward till you do. as you didn't answer I will repeat did the lactose tolerance gene start in europe? yes or no. did it start in a smaller population then spread through europe? yes or no.
the definition is change in allele frequencies in populations over time this has been the definition it hasn't changed.
special pleading and mutations happen this is a fact as cancer is a type of negative mutation. this shows how little you know about things yet you claim I am indoctrinated.
a type of wolf became dogs.
I love this edgy look! I was so excited that her hair, even as short as it is now, was still able to be put into the fun and trendy dutch pigtail braids! Instead of braiding to the ends, I ended them in close together pigtails at the nape of her neck. After I finished braiding, I tugged on the outsides of the braid gently to loosen them and make them a little messy and fun! Since she doesn’t have enough hair to tie around the elastics, I made sure to use elastics that matched her hair so they blend in as much as possible. You could also cover them with clips or bows! A view from the back of her Dutch pigtail braids! A great braid for short hair is a micro accent braid! My biggest tip for braiding short hair would be to add in small slices of hair rather than big ones. I did a small (micro) braid along a slightly curved deep part for anther cute and edgy look! You could also do another one next to it if you wanted a little more to the look, but I really liked how simple this one was. You can see how the part curves a little better from this view of the back. I ended the braid close to the head with an elastic that matched her hair. For our fourth style, we did a 3/4 french braid! Super simple but also super cute! You could do any type braid! It would also look cute using a Dutch braid or a fishtail braid! I loved the side view of this braid! I will for sure be doing this one next time she goes to gymnastics or swimming, whichever comes first! Our last braid is two four dutch lace braids into two loops in the back. Start off by parting the hair down the middle. On each side of the part, do a dutch lace braid, adding hair in from only the section closest to the part as you braid. Tie the braids together in the back with a small elastic and before you pull the hair all the way through to make a ponytail, leave it in a cute little loop! If the hair is a little bit longer, you could do a tiny bun. Repeat this directly under the braid you just did so you have two rows and two loops.
We will have to be coming up with lots more short hair braids in the future, so be sure to give us a follow over at our newly redesigned blog Abella’s Braids to see more as we do them!
Thanks for reading! See you again this time next month!
love these ideas! My daughter recently cut about 8 inches off her hair and is loving her shorter hair, but I’ve mostly been at a loss of what to do with it! Thanks!
Abella has been begging me for at least a year, probably closer to two years, to cut her hair. I posted a photo on Instagram with a question in the caption. “Abella has been begging me to cut her hair short, do you think I should let her do it?” Almost everyone said “YES!” So thanks to all of the good advice from my followers, we did it…and we haven’t regretted it for a second! I think she looks so cute and it really fits her personality! It’s for sure a lot harder to come up with braids but it’s pushed me to step out of my comfort zone! We wanted to show you that even if you have short hair, there are lots of cute braids you can still do!
This first braid (above) is three ladder braids. Start out with a part deep to one side. On the side with less hair, start out by doing a waterfall braid along the part. Under that one, do another waterfall braid, but incorporate the waterfall pieces from the one above it as you braid. Under that one, do a french braid. Incorporate the waterfall pieces from the second braid as you go. We braided each one to the ends and used elastics that matched her hair to tie them off.