Check out the Massdrop Objective 2 Headphone Amp Desktop Edition at https://dro.ps/techlinked-o2amp
GET MERCH: www.LTTStore.com
AH, MUCH SIMPLER
PC GAMES ARE XBOX GAMES
Some store changes on PC
MIGHT AS WELL CALL EM MICROSSDS
THERE’S A STUPID-NAME VIRUS GOING AROUND
UUUH NO. NO THANK YOU
UUUUUUUH PLEASE NO
AN OFFER YOU CAN (SHOULD) REFUSE
ALL-WEEK BATTERY LIFE
Wait. If it's USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 using two 10 Gbps data lanes. Wouldn't that be:
Universal Parallel Bus?
Edit: made comment before viewing comments. I was beaten to the joke long long ago. Back in Gen 2x1
seriously, who are these people in charge of naming this stuff? and how does rebranding the older names ever help anything? why would you change usb 3.0 or usb 3.1 if nothing is actually changing with how those types work? heck, if they wanted to point out that it uses 2 connections or whatever, couldnt 3.2 do that just fine by itself? rebranding the other two just creates mass confusion, it doesnt help explain anything about how it works because the average user doesnt care how it works, and the people who do care would've gotten that information elsewhere anyway. heck, they already do, as they look up why the hell its named that way because the weird name doesnt actually tell them anything. instead, people will now have to answer stupid questions like "will my current usb 3.0 port limit the speed of usb 3.2 gen 1 devices?" (actually thats not a stupid question it just has a really stupid answer XD) or worse, "why is my usb 3.2 device running slow in this usb 3.2 port on my laptop? eh? what do you mean what kind of usb 3.2 is it, i just told you its usb 3.2!" (the saddest thing about this one is that most of the people who would be asked a question like this, namely sales associates in retail electronics departments, probably wouldnt know the difference either). or, perhaps most counter intuitively, "which is faster, usb 3.1 gen 2, or usb 3.2 gen 1?" to which most people would probably think that the obvious answer was "well, usb 3.2 gen 1, obviously. its also much newer!" this is even worse than that whole sata 3 debacle, where they made "sata 3" into an ambiguous term by renaming sata II to sata 3Gbps and sata III to sata 6Gbps, all because they were worried about it being ambiguous to begin with. I am absolutely certain that for anyone who was technically savvy enough to actually concern themselves with the actual data transfer speeds, the terms were not ambiguous until they renamed it. and for everyone else, it simply doesnt even matter. all they want to know is which is faster, and the obvious answer used to be that sata 3 would obviously be faster than sata 2.
actually, heres a genuine question that I just thought of: my laptop has a usb type-c/thunderbolt 3 port that supports both usb 3.1 speeds of 10Gbps and Thunderbolt 3 speeds of 40Gbps, so if I use a usb 3.2 device, will it be able to use the thunderbolt 3 bandwidth to get usb 3.2's full 20Gbps, or will it be limited to usb 3.1's 10Gbps? heck, i'd really like to know why the hell they didnt just call the standard that came out with usb type-c "usb 4.0" to begin with. what exactly is the difference between a whole number iteration and a decimal iteration with this standard?
Corporate tricks of the trade... When you don't have enough work to do, create more. Make everything take twice as long and as confusing as possible so when you're done you're 5 minutes of work in 10 minutes, and need to look busy, you can spend 2 weeks explaining the work you just made everyone dizzy trying to understand.
For USB naming, I think it should be USB 3.5, 3.10, 3.20, etc. The number before the decimal refers to the port type; type C, in this case. 1 would be type A, and 2 would be micro-B, since these are the ones most commonly used by consumers. For anything else, such as full-sized USB type B, it would just be its full name. The number after the decimal represents the transfer speed, so that you know exactly how fast it is when you buy the cable. Once you get to Thunderbolt (3.40, for Thunderbolt 3), put USB Thunderbolt 3 on the front, and USB 3.40 below it to clearly show the naming system. Obviously it's too late now, but still it would be simpler.
This video was on point. I've been thinking tech has been getting dumber since the release of the iphone/ipad. Granted good stuff has come out since then, but I saw the future the moment Mr. Blue Jeans and Turtleneck came on stage with an idea Microsoft tried to sell in the early and late 90's to no avail. They did sell though so kudos Steve. You asshole.
Running XBox One games on Windows... RUNNING XBOX ONE GAMES ON WINDOWS!?!?!? WHAT IN THE ACTUAL *facepalm* Why own either!? Cross Platform! Just DO it! GET IT OVER WITH!!! What are they thinking!? First thing that came to mind besides poorly ported XBox games to PC... now you can play LITERAL Xbox games on PC! Now you can enjoy your console limitations on your $3k space heating liquid cooled desk appliance that hopefully is silent! I am TRIGGERED! (actually I kinda literally am!)
EDIT: This is Microsoft's thinking... "Whelp... We can't run a market soooooo... Let's just put a bullet into all of them at once and call it a day! Our products are not only pointless but redundant anyway!" Me: Let's just go Vulkan/Linux already.
This is going to be a nightmare for amazon product titles.
Compatible with USB 220.127.116.11 gen 1 gen 2 and gen 3 at 5 10 or 20gbps and 2x2 usb c type connectors and super speed usb connections including modified usb c specs as of 2019.
Linus, MicroSD Express won't speed up most of devices. It uses UHS-II pin lay out. There is a extra row of pings to get the speed up. Only devices that already have that extra row of contact pin can take the advantage of that.
That Energizer phone is too big and clunky for most users. But it may have a niche among people who will bee out in the field for days at a time and not able to charge their phones. Or I suppose you could just carry a phone and a battery pack...
"The consumer branding will only be 'SuperSpeed USB 20 gbps' "
Yes... Considering how mainstream consumers still don't know the difference between Micro USB, USB-A and USB-C, this will be a total win. Obviously! People (like my age 30, or younger), still come and ask me if they can borrow an "Android Charger", and when asking if they want a Micro-USB or a USB-C cable, they have no clue what I am talking about. Because in their mind, there is only Android charger vs Apple Charger. To even start mentioning USB-speeds will blow most people's minds. Oh, and let's not forget the confusion with Thunderbol 3 using USB-C form factor and interface.
So the only people who will understand this, are us nerds. And we hate this naming scheme!!
if you hadn't made the STEALTH reference, I'd've made it because (like IRobot) it's one of my favorite movies.
good to know the idiots of the world strive to make these movies rea- * gets bombed by kamikaze drone *
I love this edgy look! I was so excited that her hair, even as short as it is now, was still able to be put into the fun and trendy dutch pigtail braids! Instead of braiding to the ends, I ended them in close together pigtails at the nape of her neck. After I finished braiding, I tugged on the outsides of the braid gently to loosen them and make them a little messy and fun! Since she doesn’t have enough hair to tie around the elastics, I made sure to use elastics that matched her hair so they blend in as much as possible. You could also cover them with clips or bows! A view from the back of her Dutch pigtail braids! A great braid for short hair is a micro accent braid! My biggest tip for braiding short hair would be to add in small slices of hair rather than big ones. I did a small (micro) braid along a slightly curved deep part for anther cute and edgy look! You could also do another one next to it if you wanted a little more to the look, but I really liked how simple this one was. You can see how the part curves a little better from this view of the back. I ended the braid close to the head with an elastic that matched her hair. For our fourth style, we did a 3/4 french braid! Super simple but also super cute! You could do any type braid! It would also look cute using a Dutch braid or a fishtail braid! I loved the side view of this braid! I will for sure be doing this one next time she goes to gymnastics or swimming, whichever comes first! Our last braid is two four dutch lace braids into two loops in the back. Start off by parting the hair down the middle. On each side of the part, do a dutch lace braid, adding hair in from only the section closest to the part as you braid. Tie the braids together in the back with a small elastic and before you pull the hair all the way through to make a ponytail, leave it in a cute little loop! If the hair is a little bit longer, you could do a tiny bun. Repeat this directly under the braid you just did so you have two rows and two loops.
We will have to be coming up with lots more short hair braids in the future, so be sure to give us a follow over at our newly redesigned blog Abella’s Braids to see more as we do them!
Thanks for reading! See you again this time next month!
love these ideas! My daughter recently cut about 8 inches off her hair and is loving her shorter hair, but I’ve mostly been at a loss of what to do with it! Thanks!
Abella has been begging me for at least a year, probably closer to two years, to cut her hair. I posted a photo on Instagram with a question in the caption. “Abella has been begging me to cut her hair short, do you think I should let her do it?” Almost everyone said “YES!” So thanks to all of the good advice from my followers, we did it…and we haven’t regretted it for a second! I think she looks so cute and it really fits her personality! It’s for sure a lot harder to come up with braids but it’s pushed me to step out of my comfort zone! We wanted to show you that even if you have short hair, there are lots of cute braids you can still do!
This first braid (above) is three ladder braids. Start out with a part deep to one side. On the side with less hair, start out by doing a waterfall braid along the part. Under that one, do another waterfall braid, but incorporate the waterfall pieces from the one above it as you braid. Under that one, do a french braid. Incorporate the waterfall pieces from the second braid as you go. We braided each one to the ends and used elastics that matched her hair to tie them off.